hearthstone homestead hearth pad

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.

yotehunter

New Member
Dec 23, 2013
5
Nevada
new to site. I would like to keep my hearth pad as thin as i can. My pad will be 74"x44" so I was thinking 1/4 durock screwed to sub floor than build a 1" metal frame from 1" square tubing with studs 10" OC than put Roxul comfort batt r-15 cut down to 1" thick to put between the metal stubs than 1/2 durock over the metal frame and 3/4 quartzite to finish it off.

I called roxul today and they side 1" of comfort batt has an r-value of 4.1

My stove has the 6" legs so i need 2.5 for r-value.

So from what i have this should work right?

Thanks for the help.
 
Durock is not strong enough without an underlayment of at least 1/2". I would go 1" underlayment if it was me. Then you need the correct r-value between the stove and the underlayment.

Sorry just re-read your post. I'm not sure if the 3/4" stone will support a stove without underlayment
 
  • Like
Reactions: pen
so if I put the 1/2 durock to the metal frame which will have 10" on center studs the 1/2 durock will not be able to support the thin set and 3/4 stone?, I also do plan on running 1x2x.120 wall rectangle steel tubing in the frame for the studs and right where the stove legs will set. I was hoping I could use the roxul as the underlayment between the metal studs and under the 1/2 durock. Thanks

I found this early today where the guy used metal studs with roxul between the studs and 1/2 durock over the metal studs. Was hoping to do the same thing only using structural steel tubing as my frame

https://www.hearth.com/talk/threads/homestead-hearth-mount.93956/
 
Sister the studs with 2x4 then place 3/4 plywood level to top of studs
Now you have a solid base.. lay up the durock and insulating board on top
 
Last edited:
georgepds I have to keep the pad less then 3" tall. that why i was hoping i could us steel tubing as the frame and roxul as the main r-value with couple sheets of durock.
 
Just went through this ourselves. It sounds like your plan will work as far as R-value, but may not be able to support the weight of the stone and stove. Durock is not strong enough to double as an underlayment. I used multiple layers of 1/2" Durock over 3/4" plywood to get to the required R-Value. Final height (if I remember correctly) was 3 1/2" with the porcelain tile.
 
My hearth extension is free floating and maybe just under 3" thick. Laminated 2 sheets of 1/2" plywood, then 2 sheets of micore 300, then 1/2" durock, then tile. Not sure how to stay thin without using Micore or a similar product. I scavenged micore from a cubicle wall that I got at the salvage home builders store. Pretty sure the durock is not stong enough though. You might also search the r-value for vermiculite concrete. If it was high enough you could frame a 10x10 box under where the stove feet will sit and pour it in there. That way at least the feet would have a solid base.
 
dmarr, would it help if I made my studs 8 on center? that way the 1/2 durock would be only span 6" between stubs as my studs will 1x2 tubing. also lowes has 5/8 durock could try that?

rwhite, i planned on running metal studs right under the stoves legs to support the stoves weight. so i hoped the weight would transfer through the durock onto the metal studs.
 
dmarr, would it help if I made my studs 8 on center? that way the 1/2 durock would be only span 6" between stubs as my studs will 1x2 tubing. also lowes has 5/8 durock could try that?

rwhite, i planned on running metal studs right under the stoves legs to support the stoves weight. so i hoped the weight would transfer through the durock onto the metal studs.

As rwhite said, to get a thin you need to use Micore or similar. I don't think the Durock will be stable enough even with reducing the span. It just isn't designed to be used as an underlayment.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.