Coals after 8+ hours!

Ok, some of you folks take such things for granted, but I was surprised today to find this when I got home.

I left home this morning after loading up - load was sometime before 9a (not exactly sure what time, but it was before 9). I had a good bed of coals and one mostly burned split in there on top of which I loaded three good sized pieces - one of which was a 'monster' piece of 3+ year old oak that I acquired recently as part of a new load of wood. That pretty much filled up the box although there were quite a few good sized gaps in there as the pieces didn't 'fit' well together. I choked the air back slowly to about 1/4 and left it cooking....

Got home about 5:30 and was surprised to find the stove wasn't cold so I took a look inside and started raking the ash around and to my surprise there was actually some glow to the few remaining charcoal bits! Just to see what would happen I piled these together in the front of the stove and sure enough with air open they shortly were lit up into a nice pile that I'm sure I could have used to start a new fire.

So, this was a definite record for me. What changed? Well... two big things and perhaps a third factor come to mind.
1) Better wood - I had a couple pieces of this 3yr oak in there which clearly makes a big difference.
2) OAK input limiter - A few weeks ago I fit a piece of foil over the OAK input such that it covers 1/2 of the surface area. This has clearly tamed my fires and I have seen a significant increase in my heat output as well as the burn times with a corresponding decrease in flue temps while not putting smoke up the chimney (hmmm can anyone say 'overdraft confirmation'?)
3) the minor difference(?) the high temp today was around 45 or so - perhaps warmer temps outside decreased draft enough to help slow burn rate?

Open to ideas and comments - mostly I'm just excited that I may be getting the hang of this stove.. but if factor #3 is the main reason (outside temp) then perhaps my dream for overnight burns when it is cold next year are going to be dashed. Thoughts anyone?

Todd said:

I also noticed a difference with my burns because of my OAK. In fact I took it off because my stove is in my finished basement and the Oak pipe ran 8' up the wall and out through the sill plate. I think this forced the cold air down too hard and caused a kind a blast furnace effect at the beginning of the burn and cooled the stove towards the end. I tried a damper in the Oak, but it was a pain and still sucked too cold air into the stove. Yours may be different setup, and I don't really know if the OAK would work better with a horizontal run.

Click to expand...

I don't actually have the OAK installed - rather I'm simply covering the OAK connector pipe about 50% I plan to create a variable valve of some sort (I've seen pictures here of one someone designed) so I can control the inflow on demand easier than changing different pieces of foil. But for the last couple weeks I've been running with this half covered configuration and been quite happy - it is interesting how different the stove runs, a bit slower on startup (that's when I'd like to have a variable cover wide open) then it runs nice and steady once dampered down. Before I started covering the OAK input I never would see flames at the front of the stove, only in the back. Now we've had some nice pretty flames in the front of the pile which are very nice as well as steady 550-600 surface temps.

CTwoodburner said:

Why wouldn't you just cut the air back all the way in order to get a longer burn?? Am I missing something? Why restrict the air inlet when you have an air control on the stove?

Click to expand...

Like most (all?) EPA non-cat stoves, the primary air control that is given to the operator is not the full story of air inflow to the stove. With it cut all the way off there is still quite a bit of air available to the fire. At least there is still a 'hole' open for the air - the amount of air flowing in is of course a function of the suction pulling the air through it (i.e. draft on the top) and the resistance to the flow headed in (i.e. the available air to the inlet). So... the basically even with the air control completely shut off I this is still the best burn time I've achieved (even packing the stove 'full' to the best of my ability).

Yes VC lists this as a 10hr burn time - and I am targeting hitting that some day but at the moment I'm celebrating my closest achievement. I expect that I am getting closer and closer... but I don't think I'll ever hit 10hrs without further modification to the draft and/or air supply. Simply packing it full (which I have done) isn't enough here - best I got with that before was around 6 hours (prior to pulling out the roll of foil).

I'm not sure of the measurements - I need to get a ladder up there or get the sweep to measure it when we clean it this spring (I'll measure it myself if necessary - I'll be there staring down the pipe if he'll let me near the ladder if you know what I mean, heh). Anyway the setup has double wall SS 6" all the way outside and then through the wall. Inside I have about 4' of single wall up to the bend that goes 90* to meed the SS to go through the wall. If I did the pictures right here you can see the run and perhaps guess the length...