Best Wood Pound for Green Pound: Which Would You Choose?

kjayhawk Posted By kjayhawk, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:23 AM

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Jags

    Jags
    Moderate Moderator 2.
    NULL
    
    Staff Member

    Aug 2, 2006
    17,236
    5,916
    Loc:
    Northern IL
    Black Locust - 27.9 Mill Btu per cord

    Hickory - 27.5 MBTU per Cord

    Ash - 23.6 MBTU

    Red Oak - 24 MBTU

    Lodge pole Pine - 19.3 MBTU

    Ponderosa Pine - 16.2 MBTU

    Big drop off when you get into the pines.
     
  2. moosetrek

    moosetrek
    Minister of Fire 2.
    NULL
    

    Oct 22, 2008
    562
    0
    Loc:
    Eastern Nevada
    There are a lot of drop offs in the pines, especially around the rivers. But the question related to a cost by weight (ton), not volume (cord) - I would guess that pound for pound they are similar, maybe not? We've found that in general, there a good percent of standing dead pine which is fairly dry; giving a total water:wood ratio that is lower than other woods. BTW, I was being somewhat facetious knowing the demographic makeup of the forum (NE vs W)... :)
     
  3. Jags

    Jags
    Moderate Moderator 2.
    NULL
    
    Staff Member

    Aug 2, 2006
    17,236
    5,916
    Loc:
    Northern IL
    Don't use big words, I get confused pretty easy. %-P
     
  4. polaris

    polaris
    Feeling the Heat 2.
    NULL
    

    Jan 31, 2008
    419
    4
    Loc:
    KY.
    Another vote for Shagbark.
    Joe
     
  5. Tony H

    Tony H
    New Member 2.
    NULL
    

    Oct 24, 2007
    1,156
    1
    Loc:
    N Illinois
    Forum = group
    Those others are beyond me :lol:

    I think the locust and ash are both nice choices but ash is easier to spell.
     
  6. Duetech

    Duetech
    Minister of Fire 2.
    NULL
    

    Sep 15, 2008
    1,436
    2
    Loc:
    S/W MI
    The only reason I would go for black locust over shag bark hickory is I like hickory and hate to see it cut for firewood. Hickory nuts are as good as pecans to my palate. Black locust grows faster than hickory. But if the trees were down already I would take all the hickory I could get first. The btu chart I have says that hickory is a little higher in btu's than bl. locust. Red oak takes too long to dry when you have either hickory or locust and red oak is lower in btu's.
     
  7. iskiatomic

    iskiatomic
    Minister of Fire 2.
    NULL
    

    Nov 15, 2008
    725
    151
    Loc:
    Central CT
    I'll try to keep this short. Being a second year wood burner, sitting on 12+ cords of Oak, and a little of this and a little of that. The Oak that was cut, split and stacked in June of '08, recently resplit a few splits to see 30-32% show up on the moisture meter.

    I recently scored some dead stand Oak that measured 16-19%. Sweet fancy Moses! What a nice fire, killer heat, fantastic coals.

    So, therefore I have been in super scrounge mode. Looking for whatever is dead and DRY.

    I would love to find some Ash, but when you are a scrounger you take what you get.

    One thing you can't buy is time!

    Off to Boston to the ski show.


    KC
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page