1. Welcome Hearth.com Guests and Visitors - Please enjoy our forums!
    Hearth.com GOLD Sponsors who help bring the site content to you:
    Jotul Cast Iron Stoves
    Woodstock Soapstone Stoves
    Hearth and Home (QuadraFire and Harman Stoves)
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. SteveJ Member

    joined: Nov 19, 2007
    213 posts
    CO 9000ft
    Okay, I am convinced to use a storage tank and coiled copper as the hx.

    So, now the issue:

    Boiler to the house is 3/4" pex.

    I want to keep costs down as much as possible and based on the hot water heat carrying capacity of copper tube, I see that 1-1/2" copper has 6 times the heat carrying capacity of 3/4" copper.

    So, does this mean that I can use 1/6 the as much 1-1/2" coiled copper as compared to 3/4" coiled copper?

    Based on the Type-L used by STSS, 180ft of 3/4" coiled copper delivers a hx rate of 39,600 BTU at 120F, does this equate to 30ft of 1-1/2" coiled copper?

    I have found that Type-L coiled copper is $2.74/ft for 3/4" and $7.42/ft for 1-1/2" at PlumbersStock


    Does this mean for a 39,600BTU rating I can either spend $493.20 for 3/4" or $222.60 for 1-1/2"?

    What about stratification?

    Thanks,
    Steve
    #1

    Helpful Sponsor Ads!



  2. hkobus Member

    joined: Oct 26, 2007
    175 posts
    Ontario
    The numbers you are using are for the "volume" of heat carried. this is closly related to the restriction and the surface area of the cross section of pipe. The cross section of a 1.5" pipe is 4X that of a 3/4" The heat emission from the pipe will be related to the surface area of the outside of the pipe, the thikness and the temp difference between the fluids (or gas). The site you refered to, has that information as well.
    The articles on the pex HX in the hole has me thinking, I also found some info on nylon tube(air line tube on highway trucks) used in HX, it is thinner walled than pex and had has good strength and heat resitence. I will try to find the article and post the link sometime.

    Henk.
  3. BrownianHeatingTech New Member

    joined: Oct 5, 2007
    1,253 posts
    Northwood, NH
    As Henk alludes to, you want the opposite. The lower the carrying capacity, the more surface area, which means more heat transfer. Carrying capacity is great for getting heat from point A to point B with minimal losses. In the case of a heat exchanger, you want losses. A whole mess of really thin tubes (in parallel, to keep the pressure drop low) would be best.

    Joe Brown
    Brownian Heating Technology
    www.brownianheating.com
  4. Eric Johnson Minister of Fire

    joined: Nov 18, 2005
    5,703 posts
    Central NYS
    I checked out the PlumbersStock website and it's interesting. It's the only place I've seen online where you can buy pipe and fittings at the same time.

    But those don't look like wholesale prices to me. They're about what you would pay at Home Depot or Lowe's, plus shipping, which may or may not offset what you save on local sales taxes. But they appear to have a complete selection of stuff, which is more than the big boxes around here can say. You pay slightly more around here at the heating supply houses if you just walk in off the street.

    One reason I checked out the website was to price 1" gate valves. I need about 6 of them. The other day I ordered a package of 8 from an Ebay store for $50 with free shipping. I know I can find a use for the other two. On the website, 1" gate valves are going for more than $12 each. So I would recommend Ebay or an Ebay store for that kind of stuff. Close to one third the price when all is said and done.
  5. Nofossil Minister of Fire

    joined: Oct 4, 2007
    3,279 posts
    Addison County, Vermont
    I've said this before on other threads, but I'll risk censure from the site admins and say it again:

    I did my tank with copper. Lots of copper. Even without today's copper prices, I wish I had gone to a few scrapyards and scrounged finned stainless heat exchanger tubing. It seems to be pretty common, and is vastly superior to copper in terms of effectiveness per foot.
  6. SteveJ Member

    joined: Nov 19, 2007
    213 posts
    CO 9000ft
    Thanks everyone for pointing me in the right direction...

    I like nofossil's suggestion about the finned stainless.

    Short of that, what about refrigeration tube? Anyone using?

    Price seems right 3/4" < $2/foot

    Any issues submerging refrigeration tubing? Issues circulating 180F water/glycol?

    Thanks,
    Steve
  7. leaddog Minister of Fire

    joined: Sep 24, 2007
    912 posts
    Hesperia, Michigan
    refrigeration tubing uses od for size l and k uses id so 3/4 refrigeration is smaller. Just so you can compare apples to apples.

    leaddog
  8. Nofossil Minister of Fire

    joined: Oct 4, 2007
    3,279 posts
    Addison County, Vermont
    I used refrigeration tubing for my DHW preheat coil. I had to machine my sweat fittings to mate with it - non-standard OD. Otherwise, no problems.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page