Hey everyone! I've been burning mainly ash for the last 6 weeks and got used to the quality of the secondaries. I just started burning pure loads of cherry for the daytime burns and I'm finding quite a differences in the secondaries. The ash, and even more so with pure loads of oak, have very 'thick' secondaries - looks like rivers of fire exiting the holes of the secondary tubes. With cherry, the secondaries are much more 'wispy'. Hard to come up with the best adjectives for the flames, but wondering if anyone else notices major differences in the quality of the secondaries using different woods. Cheers!