1. Welcome Hearth.com Guests and Visitors - Please enjoy our forums!
    Hearth.com GOLD Sponsors who help bring the site content to you:
    Jotul Cast Iron Stoves
    Woodstock Soapstone Stoves
    Hearth and Home (QuadraFire and Harman Stoves)
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Mike Wilson New Member

    joined: Nov 19, 2005
    1,003 posts
    Orient Point, NY
    Take a look at this. Its a series of charts that allow you to compare which fuel to burn based upon the price of each individual fuel. Based upon this, it pays to burn wood (190/cord) only when oil is over 1.50 per gallon. Its interesting to compare.

    http://energy.cas.psu.edu/EnergySelector/

    -- Mike
    #1

    Helpful Sponsor Ads!



  2. Corie New Member

    joined: Nov 18, 2005
    2,428 posts
    Halifax, VA
    For the $150 we paid per ton of coal, oil would have to be just a shade over a dollar a gallon for it to be cheaper.
    AND pellets would have to be $110 a ton to be cheaper than coal. that's laughable at this point in the game

    What's #2 cost these days?
  3. saichele Minister of Fire

    joined: Nov 18, 2005
    503 posts
    Yeah, but look at the efficiencies (further down the page). 85% for NG, 60% for wood. Seems a little skewed.

    Steve
  4. babalu87 New Member

    joined: Nov 23, 2005
    1,440 posts
    middleborough, ma.
    Always pays to burn wood when you're sitting on a 6 acre lot AND can get pallets to boot %-P
  5. Corie New Member

    joined: Nov 18, 2005
    2,428 posts
    Halifax, VA
    yeah i agree the efficiencies might be a little funny


    but even if it's close, it still makes me happy I pushed the coal issue last year
  6. DavidV New Member

    joined: Nov 20, 2005
    792 posts
    Richmond VA
    with natural gas at 18-19 bucks per million btu here I'm way ahead of the game.
  7. wg_bent Minister of Fire

    joined: Nov 19, 2005
    2,248 posts
    Poughkeepsie, NY
    My lockin for oil was 2.24/gallon this year. Given that my wood price was about 15.00/ cord (gas, oil, new bar and chain for saw) Wood is a no brainer. Last year I burned roughly 1000 gallons of oil for heat and hot water. If I assume that 3/4 is for heat...rough numbers here, my cost this year would be 750 * 2.24 = 1680. That pays for my Osburn 1800. So this year I roughly break even.

    BUT...and there are a number of BUTs.

    1. The house is a lot warmer than it would have been.
    2. I'm happier that I'm doing somethign like splitting wood for exercise rather than sit on my arse.
    3. my wife is happier that it's warm in the house.
    4. The kids are getting into getting wood from the pile, and now help with getting wood.

    5. I'm no longer burning as much fossil fuels.
    - less dependence on foreign oil
    - renewable
    - less green house gas

    I'm teaching my kids the value of hard work in order to keep our home comfortable

    I think burning wood is great...I couldn't be happier...And, you all seem to be real nice folks to "hang with" in the internet.
  8. michael New Member

    joined: Nov 19, 2005
    53 posts
    In the firewood versus electricity debate, firewood will win out everytime.

    From looking at their chart, and valuing firewood at $150 a cord (which seems to be the national average), electricity would have to be 3.5 cents per kilowatt or less to recommend the use of electricity as heat. Where are electricity prices this low in the nation. Nowhere!
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page