Ok, I just bought a second stove that will go inside a fireplace that is 26" high 35" wide and just under 30" deep. I am a happy camper and can't wait until the winter to see what type of difference this will make. But, this stove is only a short term solution due to budget limitations. In about 5 years or so (maybe less) I will end up swapping out the Intrepid II with a bigger stove and I will do the same to the other stove located in another portion of the house. Which will be done first is unknown at this point.
With the size of the fire place that I have for the second stove I am still able to purchase a decent size free standing stove that would fit in that space (I think even a Jøtul Oslo with the short leg kit would fit...maybe).
So, my question is, what would I be better off buying; an insert or a free standing stove? Lets say the price and firebox size are equal on a free standing stove and an insert and both have blowers, which would give off better/more heat? Do free standing stoves provide more heat since you technically have all sides exposed (even if it is stuck in a fireplace)? Or would the insert work better since it is made to push the air out as oppose to collecting inside the fireplace?
With the size of the fire place that I have for the second stove I am still able to purchase a decent size free standing stove that would fit in that space (I think even a Jøtul Oslo with the short leg kit would fit...maybe).
So, my question is, what would I be better off buying; an insert or a free standing stove? Lets say the price and firebox size are equal on a free standing stove and an insert and both have blowers, which would give off better/more heat? Do free standing stoves provide more heat since you technically have all sides exposed (even if it is stuck in a fireplace)? Or would the insert work better since it is made to push the air out as oppose to collecting inside the fireplace?
