1. Welcome Hearth.com Guests and Visitors - Please enjoy our forums!
    Hearth.com GOLD Sponsors who help bring the site content to you:
    Jotul Cast Iron Stoves
    Woodstock Soapstone Stoves
    Hearth and Home (QuadraFire and Harman Stoves)
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. bwolfe1 Member

    joined: Sep 2, 2006
    57 posts
    Sedore Stove Model 3000 Chamber size is 12.5 x 20 x 24" deep

    Attached Files:

    #1

    Helpful Sponsor Ads!



  2. DonCT New Member

    joined: Dec 9, 2005
    609 posts
    Bristol, Connecticut
    That's an interesting look. What's the firebox size?
  3. bwolfe1 Member

    joined: Sep 2, 2006
    57 posts
    The firebox is 20" wide x 12" front to back x 27" deep,(top to bottom)
  4. bwolfe1 Member

    joined: Sep 2, 2006
    57 posts
    Sedore Stoves are now in full production in the US. The first customer is using his stove and is pleased. Two Md: 2000's are in service in New York and Ohio. Seven more will go out this week.
  5. smirnov3 Feeling the Heat

    joined: Feb 7, 2006
    413 posts
    Eastern Ma
    I am curious about these Sedore stoves

    1) can they really burn wood chips w/o creosote build up?

    2) if this top loading / bottom burning design is so great, why isn't everybody doing it?

    Sedore claims that these things can burn almost any fuel for 15 or more hours with a steady heat and no creosote. what's the catch?
  6. Todd Minister of Fire

    joined: Nov 19, 2005
    8,785 posts
    Lake Wissota
    Interesting stove. Has it gone through the EPA standards and have a UL label? What is the GPH and efficiency? BTW that's one hot avatar.
  7. bwolfe1 Member

    joined: Sep 2, 2006
    57 posts
    The stove has not been tested for EPA Certification nor do I have any figures on the GPH. The stove is however ULC Approved. If someone knows of a inexpensive to have any of this testing done or any alternatives please let me know. The last figures I saw on developing a stove and having EPA certified was $100 TO $200 grand. No Small stove company can afford this expense. The stoves are however being tested in Canada and when the results are in I'll share them.
  8. wilbilt New Member

    joined: Oct 13, 2007
    243 posts
    Nor Cal
    I would like to have read all of that, but it turned out to be difficult.

    Paragraphs, please.
  9. kawade New Member

    joined: Aug 12, 2008
    1 posts
    india
    i am in india.

    it may be difficult to have one sedeor stove.

    will you pl provide detailed drawings, and list of material, alongwith permission to 'd i y'

    hear in india?

    y a kawade-----------------===
  10. bwolfe1 Member

    joined: Sep 2, 2006
    57 posts
    wilbuit,
    No I will not provide any prints for the stove and neither would any other stove company.
  11. brogsie Member

    joined: Dec 19, 2007
    228 posts
    eastern MA
    Bruce,
    How much do the Sedore Stoves go for?
  12. Corie New Member

    joined: Nov 18, 2005
    2,428 posts
    Halifax, VA
    Bruce,

    If you want to be a serious solid fuel manufacturer, get the stove UL listed and EPA certified. The full battery of tests for certification and UL safety is less than $10,000. Whoever told you $100 to $200 grand is from another planet.
  13. N/A N/A New Member

    joined: May 10, 2008
    383 posts
    Bruce, sounds like you got yourself something good. Sounds like your a hard worker and so you deserve it. Good luck with your stove company and in the future I hope to give one of those stoves a try. Jim
  14. rich81 New Member

    joined: Dec 10, 2006
    199 posts
    holy crap! that looks like it holds some wood
  15. bill*67 Member

    joined: Jan 24, 2008
    133 posts
    upper michigan
    sounds like an interesting stove. i would like to see more pictures and a price list please. :cheese:
  16. myzamboni Minister of Fire

    joined: May 22, 2007
    1,071 posts
    Silicon Valley
    click on the site link in his signature for more pics and pricing.
  17. Adios Pantalones Minister of Fire

    CO in the exhaust is not the SOURCE of inefficiency, but it may be one measure. However- it could belch black smoke too, and those particulates are not CO but are clearly also a sign of inefficiency.

    At certain points in firing a kiln it's desirable to have an inefficient, "reducing atmosphere" burn. Sometimes there is black smoke associated, but the CO gas in the combustion products is what is really doing a lot of the reduction. You are right that it's pretty cheap to do the measurement of efficiency, but getting the govt to slap a "certified" sticker on something often costs.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page