Taking a homes kWh usage for a month and converting it to Wood BTU

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Plissken

New Member
Sep 22, 2013
8
I have a home that past two years averaged 169 CCF over the coldest 5 months of the year.

So my season is 845 CCF. What is the proper method for extrapolating this out to the same amount of wood like White Oak, Hickory, Apple, Maple, etc. for sizing the load of wood I would need to keep on hand to make it through a season with an EPA certified add on furnace?

So it my math is correct:

So my 845 CCF is 84 million BTU's?

So I would need something like 5 cords of White Oak / Hickory / Apple? Properly split and seasoned to take into account about 65% real efficiency?
 
Last edited:
With an outdoor furnace the calculations reveal about 6 cords. Ok, there were no calcs, but I bet I am close. I am sure you can Google the number of BTUs in a card of firewood, but have you accounted for all the inefficiencies in the new system? Is the 65% efficiency provided by the manufacturer? I bet real-life efficiency is lower than the reported value.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Plissken
I am looking at the Drolet Tundra and they have a stated optimum efficiency of 76%. So I was giving myself a fudge factor of ~12%.

I'm taking into account the chimney draft, the wood being used etc... Manufactures zealousness ;-)

I think I can net a cord of hardwood for about $70 per cord. So if I spend about $350 on wood heat for a winter it will be ~3 - 4 years to pay back the cost of the furnace in savings vs the $600-700 in natural gas.

Thanks for the napkin math to confirm my thoughts.
 
I am looking at the Drolet Tundra and they have a stated optimum efficiency of 76%. So I was giving myself a fudge factor of ~12%.

I'm taking into account the chimney draft, the wood being used etc... Manufactures zealousness ;-)

I think I can net a cord of hardwood for about $70 per cord. So if I spend about $350 on wood heat for a winter it will be ~3 - 4 years to pay back the cost of the furnace in savings vs the $600-700 in natural gas.

Thanks for the napkin math to confirm my thoughts.
Have you taken into account the inefficiency of your gas heat? If your gas is say, 90% efficient then really you're only putting about 75.6 MBTU into your home, and a 65% eff. wood heat would need 116 MBTU (4.5 cords of Oak). That assumes your 845 CCF = 84 MBTU (I didn't verify that).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Plissken
I do believe that 845CCF = 84 MBTU.

So 120 MBTU ~5 cords of white oak or shag bark hickory (common around Northern KY).
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.