1. Welcome Hearth.com Guests and Visitors - Please enjoy our forums!
    Hearth.com GOLD Sponsors who help bring the site content to you:
    Jotul Cast Iron Stoves
    Woodstock Soapstone Stoves
    Hearth and Home (QuadraFire and Harman Stoves)
  1. Beardog Member

    joined: Jan 13, 2011
    159 posts
    NW CT
    I have 3 cord of 3 year seasoned oak and locust loaded up for the cold weather, what do you prefer to burn of the two? I like locust since I've had it before, but haven't had any 3 yr seasoned oak yet. Looking forward to some long burn times and good heat with either species.
    #1

    Helpful Sponsor Ads!



  2. SolarAndWood Minister of Fire

    joined: Feb 3, 2008
    6,714 posts
    Syracuse NY
    Burn the Locust, the Oak probably isn't dry yet.
  3. bogydave Minister of Fire

    joined: Dec 4, 2009
    7,769 posts
    So Cent ALASKA
    Don't have either type here.
    I'd burn the locust, it has less moisture from the get-go & will be drier than the oak.
    What type of oak? The red oaks are the slowest to dry. White oak should be primo after 3 years :)
  4. weatherguy Minister of Fire

    joined: Feb 20, 2009
    2,716 posts
    Central Mass
    Id burn the oak now and mix oak and locust when the real cold gets here, the oak should be just fine after three years.
    Scotty Overkill likes this.
  5. gzecc Minister of Fire

    joined: Sep 24, 2008
    2,852 posts
    NNJ
    I agree with mixing it with the locust. More oak in the daytime, more and bigger locust for overnights.
    Scotty Overkill likes this.
  6. Scotty Overkill firewood hoarder

    joined: Sep 24, 2011
    6,818 posts
    central PA
    I love 'em both. But locust wins in the longevity department no matter which way you slice it. It burns long and hot, and leaves a great coal bed. I like to mix the two, as was mentioned above. Oak likes to take off quick and hot, the locust is a little more sluggish to get going. And if you've had that oak split and stacked for three years, it should be ready to rock!
    Backwoods Savage and blujacket like this.
  7. PapaDave Minister of Fire

    Unless it was sitting in a swamp or 90+ humidity those 3 years, the oak's gooder to go.
    The weather hasn't been real bad yet...here, so I'd save the good stuff (whatever that is to you), and burn the rest now.
    I'm still mixing in a bit of soft stuff with the oak during the day and bigger oak for overnight.
    Backwoods Savage likes this.
  8. Beardog Member

    joined: Jan 13, 2011
    159 posts
    NW CT
    Thanks. I'm sitting on roughly 11 cords right now, and the 3 year old stacks are 90% oak/locust. Been tossing in cherry and maple up to this point, but that is running low at this point. Need some cold weather!
  9. Backwoods Savage Minister of Fire

    joined: Feb 14, 2007
    24,158 posts
    Michigan
    Beardog, that is one of those wonderful questions! Oh how many of us wish we had both oak and locust. Or even one or the other. You can't go wrong with either of those woods so just burn and be happy.
    PapaDave likes this.
  10. Wood Duck Minister of Fire

    joined: Feb 26, 2009
    3,764 posts
    Central PA
    I don't see a big difference between the two woods when I burn them. Both are among the best for long burning and lots of BTUs, although both are a little slow to start. If you have to start new fires, I'd save some lighter wood to mix with the oak and locust when you're starting.

Share This Page