In post one this thread user
@Happy Stacker referred to anonymous user "he" who apparently says BKVP said "there is no standard for determining BTU output so the numbers are basically bogus."
User "He" will now be beaten, deservedly, about the head and shoulders with my Oxford English Dictionary. Thankfully for He I own the compact edition that comes with a magnifying glass, not the full size version that compares favorably in weight to a leather bound set of the Encyclopedia Britannica.
At the very least "He" should learn correct use of the comma, it used to be taught to seven year olds in the second grade.
In the meantime, having been failed by either precision (likely) or the majestic power of the English language (unlikely), let us turn to the ultimate arbiter of the English language.
"not" is the ordinary adverb of negation dating in print to at least 1362.
"regulated" governed by rule, properly controlled or directed, adjusted to some standard, etc. Dates to 1641 in surviving printed material.
"bogus" an apparatus for counterfeit coining, dating to July 6, 1827, American, Painesville, Ohio "Telegraph" newspaper, likely an abbreviation of "bogus press" as used in the Philadelphia "Spirit of the Times" 12 October 1844.
The implication of the incorrect quote is that Chris has something negative to say about his competitors. In fact, "not regulated" carries no implication of negativity to his competitors and is merely a fact.
If you do not understand the difference I question your privileges of both voting and reproduction.