I'm in the process of replacing my pre-EPA ESW and could use some help choosing between the King Ultra and the King Classic. My installation has no clearance issues with either stove. I don't plan to use an ash tray but I would like a pedestal to raise the height of the stove. I am planning to use the fans.
This is a topic near and dear to my heart, since I considered just this decision. My conclusion--the Classic is set up for radiant heating (no shields or convection deck) the Ultra is set up for convective heating, aka hot air (shields and convection deck). Each can be altered to the alternate role, but that's the way the models comes configured. On to your questions...
Questions:
1. Can the pedestal be had without the ash tray?
If you mean can the Ultra be ordered without the ash tray, I'd guess not.
2. Is the pedestal available for the Classic?
Dunno again, but if the pedestal could be ordered separately that would be nice. There's a contact link on the BK site. If you find out, please post here and let us know.
3. Are there functional considerations between these two models I need to consider besides reduced clearances for the Ultra?
As above, the Ultra comes with pedestal, ash drawer and ash hatch (I believe), side shields and convection deck, and is set up for convective heating, aka hot air--which means using BK's blower, which must be purchased separately. I want to use my own ceiling fan, for quieter operation. That means running the stove without the shields and convection deck, for without BK's blower, the heat will be trapped in there, except for some natural convection. Hence I'm going with the Classic, though it would be nice to get the Ultra's pedestal for looks and 4" extra height. I'm planning on just building the hearth to whatever height I need.
4. Can someone recommend a BK dealer in IA/IL/MO?
Yes, but I don't want to advertise here (though I am not connected with any manufacturer or dealer, despite my opinions
). PM me if you want.
Thanks in advance.