Anybody have any experience with this saw? Thinking of getting one, my old saw crapped out on me and I need something new.
FWWARDEN said:I understand the power to length ratio. I think I'd keep the 18" bar on the machine, as I'd only have to use the full length on occasion; I have 20 acres, so I pretty much have my pick of what to cut. I'm more interested in knowing longevity of the saw. Has anyone owned one for any length of time.
mikepinto65 said:I know ALOT of people will recommend the 5100 hands down. With that being said, dont shy away from the weeeeee bit smaller counterpart, PS510. I went with the 510 and not only saved $100, but ended up with a really good and powerful saw. Im not sure if anyone on here has any experience with the 510 (all you hear about is the 5100), but you will not be disappointed in it. This goes the same if you do any research on it in arboristsite.com.....you'll get all praise on the 5100 and very little info on the 510. Sure the 5100 has 14500 rpm opposed to to the 510's 13500 but man the 510 sounds like its going to explode when its running through a log full throttle!
Just another thing to consider...
mikepinto65 said:Well put Gooserider, as an aside the 09/10 pamphlet I picked up from my Dolmar dealer has the PS420, 510, AND 5100 listed as Professional mid-range model saws. The only saws it lists as Professional are the PS-6400, 7300 and the 7900.
Also I couldnt see any difference that would make the 510 any harder to work on compared to the 5100, they looked identical.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.