Harman Pb105 Which setting would use least pellets

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
  • Hope everyone has a wonderful and warm Thanksgiving!
  • Super Cedar firestarters 30% discount Use code Hearth2024 Click here
Status
Not open for further replies.

Chris04626

Minister of Fire
Hearth Supporter
Basically im using it right now for hot water and little bit of heat at night

I have it set at 140 low and 165 high with a feed of 3

Would putting the feed higher cause it to heat quicker so it reaches its set point quicker thus maybe using less pellets overall?


Thoughts on what the best setting would be
 
Lower your minimum setpoint. If most of your use is for hot water, the mixing valve will compensate for lower temperatures. A wider spread will require less frequent cycles.
 
When I had my PB105 I set the upper limit to 180 and the minimum to 140. I also had the outdoor air temp probe installed and I let that automatically adjust the upper limit based on the outdoor air temp.

As for the feed rate I set that by putting my boiler under a heavy load by filling up my tubs with hot water. I then set the feed rate to 6 and watched the burn pot. If I saw unburned pellets falling into the ash pan I backed off the feed rate a little bit and then watched again. I left the feed rate alone once I had about an inch of ash forming between the burning pellets and the edge of the burn pot.

The only time I adjusted the feed rate after that was if I switched the brand of pellets. Most of the time my feed rate stayed between 5 and 5 1/2 in the 5 years I used the boiler.

Once you get the feed rate adjusted leave it alone and let the onboard electronics do the work for you. In my experience they did a great job.
 
Lower your minimum setpoint. If most of your use is for hot water, the mixing valve will compensate for lower temperatures. A wider spread will require less frequent cycles.

140 is as low as it goes
 
When I'm using it just for hot water, I set the temperature range about the same as you have it and I leave the feed rate between 4 and 5, maybe closer to 5. My goal was to keep a wide enough range so it cycles less and keep the water temperature on the lower end of the scale.
 
I tried putting it on 140 and 175 and plugged in the outside sensor and i burned 1 bag in a day for just hot water. Not bad

So, if you use $4 per bag ($200 per ton), you would be spending around $120 per month to heat your hot water.
 
Yes. That seems a little high on the usage for just hot water. My PB105 usually uses about 2 bags per week during the summer for just hot water. Right now it's higher because some is being used for heat at night and early mornings.
 
I don't think its coming on on at night for heat. We do use a pretty good amount of hot water, Not sure seems i always burn more than i should be
 
Last edited:
best setting to save fuel? OFF The best way to heat hot water is a heat pump HW heater. (summer operation ONLY) With the use of the HW heater it eliminates the necessity of a de-humidifier ( necessary for most homes) so for all intents and purposes your hot water is free. winter use is not recommended (by me)
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.