"so if you have a 100 ah battery, /20 you in theory can get about 5 hours out of it."
Looking at those two SAM's club batteries I posted, I can't tell what they are. The group size 34 says 20 amp hour rate:55
And the group size 31 says
- 1 amp hour rate:68.2
- 100 amp hour rate:110
- 20 amp hour rate:105
- 3 amp hour rate:8585Ah
- 5 amp hour rate:86
- 6 amp hour rate:87.4
- 8 amp hour rate:90
How do I find out what the ah of these two batteries are?
Something is messed up about that spec sheet, I cant make any sense of it. A group 31 battery is usually in the 100Ah (20hour) range. Here is a typical spec sheet for a G31 battery - (broken link removed)
20 hour rate - 5amps (20x5=100Ah)
10hr rate - 9.3A (93Ah)
5hr rate - 17A (85Ah)
1hr rate - 60A (60Ah)
Also notice the cycle life chart - full discharges will give you ~200 recharges, half will give you 500, 1/3 will give you 1200! recharges.
If you are serious about getting a set of batteries with solar charging that can run this load for days you are going to end up spending some real $$. You might find out a small inverter generator is cheaper in the long run. If you do go battery and solar I highly recommend doing a lot of research first, read the entire battery FAQ I posted and also post on the solar forum at Arizona Wind-Sun for some advice from guys who have done this before.
General rules of thumb for solar:
* Figure your max daily Ah usage and double it to size the battery (full off grid setups go even bigger to have a 2-3 day reserve for bad weather but that should be good for an emergency setup)
* Size your solar array for at least 1W of panel per Ah of battery
see the post above yours. draining is not 1:1. different loads will kill a battery faster or slower. There's a distribution around its efficiency range., potentially bi-modal (2 humps).
Its actually a relatively linear relationship, the faster your discharge the lower the efficiency, directly proportional to the internal resistance of the battery. What happens is that
for faster discharges more current gets converted to heat overcoming that resistance. There are formulas to calculate it based on a constant called the Pukert coefficient. Some high end battery manufacturers (Like Crown, Surette, Concord, etc) publish that number.
Because the state paid 60% of the system, that's why! And we would have to change out our inverters to ones that would feed to batteries, we were told.
Its not necessarily that you need different inverters, but you do need a lot of other equipment that adds a lot of cost. These setups rarely get certified for subsidized installs and cost a lot more.
In an off grid system, the panel DC output feeds a charge control that charges the battery, and then the battery is connected to the inverter to feed AC loads.
In a grid tie system they cut a lot of costs out by removing the charge controller and battery and just feed the inverters directly. Since there is no battery they just backfeed the grid to get rid of excess generation. Grid tie systems are designed to shutoff when the power is out because if they didn't they would backfeed a dead grid and possibly injure a lineman just like when some idiot backfeeds with a generator through his dryer outlet with the main breaker on.
To build a grid tie with backup, you would need to take the entire grid tie setup, also add batteries and a charge controller, and an automatic grid disconnect of some sort to decouple from the grid when its down to prevent a backfeed. You might also need control logic to prevent the inverter from draining down the battery when the grid is live. This adds a lot of expense to an already expensive system.