Hello there,
I posted a few years ago and got a great response from this community, so I thought I'd post again with another question that google can't solve, but maybe you guys can.
A pallet of sawdust bricks, which are kiln dried oak, is $582 Canadian dollars. That's 81 x 4 bricks equals 324 bricks. This has been called half a cord of wood, all that way up to 1.5 cords of wood.
The wood option for me, from about the only reliable guy here, is $600/cord. All his wood is spruce, compared to the oak sawdust, and the moisture on that spruce is most likely higher than on the kiln-dried oak sawdust bricks. Some other suppliers may be able to get me a cord for 550, but they flake all the time.
Are the sawdust bricks A) a no brainer, B) difficult to judge which is a better deal, C) something else - any thoughts or ideas?
My thought is that the oak bricks win. Even if they are more expensive on a BTU level, they're packed better, cleaner to transport into my house, and take up less space. But what I really need more than anything is to be able to burn something like 8 cords a winter. I burned about 5 cords this last winter and needed to compensate with propane for the rest (heated garage and a basement room, and the propane for my hot water as well). I was burning the stove on just above the active zone (low), to medium, most of the winter. It's a blazeking Ashford 30. I've figured I can burn it at full the whole winter and still save more in propane than added cost in either wood or sawdust bricks.
So far, I've used both the spruce and the sawdust bricks. I've put in as many as 6-7 bricks and not overfired the stove. If you lay them right next to each other, they don't expand, so they can burn for even longer. I put 4 like that as the base layer - on top, I put two or three more spaced apart for a quicker temp recovery. I could actually probably put 10 or 12 bricks in there if I wanted to - as long as the airflow is low enough to compensate, they can't all burn as once, in my experience.
For background I'm in the NWT, northern Canada. We get a few months that average -25 to -35, with some days as low as -50 Celsius once in a while. The house is 2700 square feet, two floors and house layout is compartmentalized, but with good flow around the main floor for the wood stove due to wide openings.
Thanks!
I posted a few years ago and got a great response from this community, so I thought I'd post again with another question that google can't solve, but maybe you guys can.
A pallet of sawdust bricks, which are kiln dried oak, is $582 Canadian dollars. That's 81 x 4 bricks equals 324 bricks. This has been called half a cord of wood, all that way up to 1.5 cords of wood.
The wood option for me, from about the only reliable guy here, is $600/cord. All his wood is spruce, compared to the oak sawdust, and the moisture on that spruce is most likely higher than on the kiln-dried oak sawdust bricks. Some other suppliers may be able to get me a cord for 550, but they flake all the time.
Are the sawdust bricks A) a no brainer, B) difficult to judge which is a better deal, C) something else - any thoughts or ideas?
My thought is that the oak bricks win. Even if they are more expensive on a BTU level, they're packed better, cleaner to transport into my house, and take up less space. But what I really need more than anything is to be able to burn something like 8 cords a winter. I burned about 5 cords this last winter and needed to compensate with propane for the rest (heated garage and a basement room, and the propane for my hot water as well). I was burning the stove on just above the active zone (low), to medium, most of the winter. It's a blazeking Ashford 30. I've figured I can burn it at full the whole winter and still save more in propane than added cost in either wood or sawdust bricks.
So far, I've used both the spruce and the sawdust bricks. I've put in as many as 6-7 bricks and not overfired the stove. If you lay them right next to each other, they don't expand, so they can burn for even longer. I put 4 like that as the base layer - on top, I put two or three more spaced apart for a quicker temp recovery. I could actually probably put 10 or 12 bricks in there if I wanted to - as long as the airflow is low enough to compensate, they can't all burn as once, in my experience.
For background I'm in the NWT, northern Canada. We get a few months that average -25 to -35, with some days as low as -50 Celsius once in a while. The house is 2700 square feet, two floors and house layout is compartmentalized, but with good flow around the main floor for the wood stove due to wide openings.
Thanks!