BeGreen said:A search will get you more info than you can read in one night, with pictures and movies too.
Wood Duck said:Yeah, as the previous guys said the secondaries are flames at the top of the stove burning wood gases and smoke released from the wood. The primary flame is also burning gases but it appears down at wood level. In a campfire you get mostly only primary flame, so the part of the burn that looks like a campfire is the primary. The secondary is all gravy made possible by the wonders of modern technology.
Texas boy said:Okay, thanks for all the input. So . . . :
Are secondaries a good thing or not? Are they part of a progression to getting to a long, slow 12-hour burn or do I want to avoid them?
All y'all are apparently way more experienced than me and seem to understand how all this works. I'm still puzzling it out. Some say, put the wood in on a good ember bed, engage the cat and turn the air to minimum and leave it. Ron at Woodstock said he hadn't heard of that and wants to check it out, but the poster said someone at Woodstock had told him to do it and that it worked well. So, I'm confused.
So, will y'all experienced burners who have the Progress clue me in on what works for this machine? I just need a rough starting point so I can adjust from that. As you all know, I have the Progress, a lot of VERY old cedar rounds, a lot of dry hardwood pieces from a pallet manufacturer AND a damper installed just back of the stove on the horizontal connector pipe. All this is hooked to a 6" 25' SS, liner in a high wind environment with a STRONG draft 98% of the time, which is why Ron suggested the damper install.
Much obliged!
Texas boy said:Okay, thanks for all the input. So . . . :
Are secondaries a good thing or not? Are they part of a progression to getting to a long, slow 12-hour burn or do I want to avoid them?
All y'all are apparently way more experienced than me and seem to understand how all this works. I'm still puzzling it out. Some say, put the wood in on a good ember bed, engage the cat and turn the air to minimum and leave it. Ron at Woodstock said he hadn't heard of that and wants to check it out, but the poster said someone at Woodstock had told him to do it and that it worked well. So, I'm confused.
So, will y'all experienced burners who have the Progress clue me in on what works for this machine? I just need a rough starting point so I can adjust from that. As you all know, I have the Progress, a lot of VERY old cedar rounds, a lot of dry hardwood pieces from a pallet manufacturer AND a damper installed just back of the stove on the horizontal connector pipe. All this is hooked to a 6" 25' SS, liner in a high wind environment with a STRONG draft 98% of the time, which is why Ron suggested the damper install.
Much obliged!
fire_man said:Terry:
Here is my take on those secondaries.
Secondaries are an unavoidable result of getting the firebox up high enough in temperature, so that the outgassing from wood "ignites", thus forming those twirly flamy guys above the wood. (Hey, I am starting to speak in Texan!)
Non catalytic stoves use this principle to get low emissions and more efficiency, they have a firebox which is well insulated and can reach higher temps so that the air spurting out from the burn tubes can iginite the smoke. Catalytic stoves do not have to reach such high firebox temps to burn efficiently, because the cat "lights off" at lower temps (500F instead of 1000F) and the cat burns the smoke at a lower temperature. Even with a cat stove, the firebox eventually reaches a critical temperature and you get secondaries (at least I always have with the Fireview).
Once the secondaries kick in, the firebox temp climbs even more, and it's hard to quiet them down.
Are secondaries a good thing?? Well, if you want lots of heat and an efficient burn, Yes. But if you want minimal heat and a very long burn time, then you want to keep them OFF for as long as possible. There are a couple ways to keep them off:
1. Reduce the air intake setting as low as possible.
2. Engage the cat at a very low firebox temp, but not so low that you stall the cat.
3. split your wood bigger (wider splits)
I kind of wonder if your ancient wood will outgas at a faster rate than those of using wood dated after 1000 BC. I suspect your secondaries may be more active and last longer than mine. The longest my secondaries lasted so far was 2.5 hours.
By the way, check your Iconel screen, it may have blown loose when you got that nuclear explosion earlier.
Hope this helps!
Texas boy said:Oh HAR HAR, Tony! You've seen my wood--it IS old, but don't over-exagerate with that 1000 BC stuff when it's only about 800 BC!But, you're probably right and I've suspected that the low MC might be the cause of the gases going into secondaries for so long. Less moisture probably does something to the process, I'm just not smart enough to know what it is exactly and how to adjust for it.
I received a narrative from WS that I'm gonna try this weekend. I was trying to make the long burn happen on a single load of wood, but now see that it's a two-part process. That was what I wasn't understanding. So, tonight I'm setting it up to see how long I can maintain a decent temp in the great room, since it's supposed to be in the 30s and 40s for the next three days. I'm learning slowly, but surely.
I checked the screen. It's still in there. Looks okay, except it's in two pieces with a little gap between. Is that the way it's supposed to be? It's concave facing the air path.
I'm gonna try several different things y'all have suggested. My repertoire is expanding. I'll be doing custom burns in no time!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.