You think so?
- Thread starter mcdougy
- Start date
-
Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.
We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.
We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil. -
Super Cedar firestarters 30% discount Use code Hearth2024 Click here
Well, humans have been engineering living things since the advent of animal husbandry and agriculture. They are not gonna stop now.
I don't worry to much about climate 'tipping points' bc I think there is plenty of 'negative feedback' in the climate forcing equation (i.e. temp response is sublinear in forcing from CO2, for example), BUT it remains true that sea ice and forest loss and peat burning ARE positive feedback terms.
Tree are going to be part of the solution, and that only works if they are stable against pests and don't die on the new climate. If arborists need to deploy gentech trees to achieve that, more power to them.
I don't worry to much about climate 'tipping points' bc I think there is plenty of 'negative feedback' in the climate forcing equation (i.e. temp response is sublinear in forcing from CO2, for example), BUT it remains true that sea ice and forest loss and peat burning ARE positive feedback terms.
Tree are going to be part of the solution, and that only works if they are stable against pests and don't die on the new climate. If arborists need to deploy gentech trees to achieve that, more power to them.
Similar threads
