OAK question when using a thimble; 2 1/2 be made into 3 inch?

Post in 'The Pellet Mill - Pellet and Multifuel Stoves' started by zrtmatos, Dec 3, 2012.

  1. zrtmatos

    zrtmatos
    Expand Collapse
    Feeling the Heat

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2012
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    42
    Loc:
    Connecticut
    I am doing an install on a stove requiring a 4 inch output. I have thimble similar to this one, http://www.dynamitebuys.com/store/cart.php?m=product_detail&p=5966 , that has a 2 and 1/2 diameter knockout to be used for an OAK. Can I make this hole larger so as to hookup the 3 inch OAK it calls for? Would I be cutting into the clearance on the thimble, piping? The chimney is PellentVentPro.
     
    Collapse Signature Expand Signature

    Helpful Sponsor Ads!





  2. smoke show

    smoke show
    Expand Collapse
    Guest

    I'd do it if it looked like it would work, but someone will come along and mention voiding the UL listing or something like that.
     
  3. zrtmatos

    zrtmatos
    Expand Collapse
    Feeling the Heat

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2012
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    42
    Loc:
    Connecticut
    Thanks Smoke. Has anyone else done this?
     
    Collapse Signature Expand Signature
  4. SmokeyTheBear

    SmokeyTheBear
    Expand Collapse
    Minister of Fire

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    13,363
    Likes Received:
    1,662
    Loc:
    Standish, ME
    As long as the thimble pass through section that the vent passes through is not changed, you should be fine that pass through provides the clearance to combustibles needed do not do anything that modifies that portion of the thimble.

    It is the third layer of the vent that excludes any material coming in contact with the vent itself.
     
    Collapse Signature Expand Signature
  5. zrtmatos

    zrtmatos
    Expand Collapse
    Feeling the Heat

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2012
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    42
    Loc:
    Connecticut
    Sorry Smokey. I am not sure I understand your answer.
    I am not planning any change to the main pass through section in the thimble. The 4 inch diameter section remains untouched and the outer section cutout (approx 7+") to that remain unchanged. This chimney system has a 1 inch clearance to any combustable. What I would like to do is make the 2 and 1/2 inch cutout plate larger by 1/2 inch and I would cut at an angle so as to keep the original distance from the pass through. Here's a drawing that might explain it better.

    thimble question.jpg
    Please let me know your thoughts. Anyone?
     
    Collapse Signature Expand Signature
  6. Lousyweather

    Lousyweather
    Expand Collapse
    Guest

    *sigh* Smoke Show nailed it for me......ANY modification made to a UL listed system is technically incorrect, and you void the UL listing in doing so. Why not simply use the correct part? (yea, lol, I'll take the heat for being a harda$$ on this one)
     
  7. zrtmatos

    zrtmatos
    Expand Collapse
    Feeling the Heat

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2012
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    42
    Loc:
    Connecticut
    Lousyweather, the issue is if making a 1/2 inch adjustment in what the thimble is designed for and if it will make a difference? We are talking about making an air opening larger, not making the venting area smaller. I hope this is understood correctly with the enclosed drawing.
     
    Collapse Signature Expand Signature
  8. Lousyweather

    Lousyweather
    Expand Collapse
    Guest

    ANY alteration. Do you have any qualitative data to prove that it is in fact safe? ANY modifications technically invalidate the UL listing.
     
  9. SmokeyTheBear

    SmokeyTheBear
    Expand Collapse
    Minister of Fire

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    13,363
    Likes Received:
    1,662
    Loc:
    Standish, ME
    LW is technically correct, this is like the how do I make it fit in a much deeper wall.

    You can call the venting manufacturer. and ask.
     
    Collapse Signature Expand Signature
  10. briansol

    briansol
    Expand Collapse
    Minister of Fire

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2009
    Messages:
    1,913
    Likes Received:
    293
    Loc:
    central ct
    Why not get a 3->2.5" reducer and try it first? The smaller opening is honestly not that much of a difference... and once the pipe is filled with air, it shouldn't be that much of an issue. Run it and see if the stove is starved for air. I doubt it will be.
     
    Collapse Signature Expand Signature
    zrtmatos likes this.
  11. SmokeyTheBear

    SmokeyTheBear
    Expand Collapse
    Minister of Fire

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    13,363
    Likes Received:
    1,662
    Loc:
    Standish, ME

    The test is to determine if any combustible material placed in direct contact with the pass through wall will ignite.

    That pass through wall becomes in essence the third wall in a vent system (makes it a zero clearance triple walled vent).
     
    Collapse Signature Expand Signature
  12. zrtmatos

    zrtmatos
    Expand Collapse
    Feeling the Heat

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2012
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    42
    Loc:
    Connecticut
    This may be a good first try. Thanks for the input all.
     
    Collapse Signature Expand Signature
  13. SmokeyTheBear

    SmokeyTheBear
    Expand Collapse
    Minister of Fire

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    13,363
    Likes Received:
    1,662
    Loc:
    Standish, ME
    The 3" has a cross section area of 7.06 square inches and the 2.5 " has a cross section area of 4.90 square inches give it a try just remember the 3" has 1.44 times the cross section area.
     
    Collapse Signature Expand Signature
  14. Lousyweather

    Lousyweather
    Expand Collapse
    Guest

    Smoky has alot of time now since the Zumba classes have ended! :eek:
     
    briansol likes this.
  15. briansol

    briansol
    Expand Collapse
    Minister of Fire

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2009
    Messages:
    1,913
    Likes Received:
    293
    Loc:
    central ct
    I can see running on high that it might get a little starved, but on a medium setting that will fill 90% of your burning, it should suffice.
     
    Collapse Signature Expand Signature
  16. SmokeyTheBear

    SmokeyTheBear
    Expand Collapse
    Minister of Fire

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    13,363
    Likes Received:
    1,662
    Loc:
    Standish, ME

    Unfortunately it has to be run on high to set the damper. Since the air is not being taken from the same place as it was and the damper is the course fuel/air mixture control it will have to operate on high. No way around it. The only question is will it be air starved on high due to the difference in the venting at the exit, one way to find out try it.

    But please set the stove up correctly after you install the OAK. It prevents all kinds of issues later on..
     
    Collapse Signature Expand Signature

Share This Page

Entire Site copyright © 1995-2016 - email to webinfo@hearth.com
Hearth.com and HearthNet are property and trademarks of Hearth.com LLC Advertising Information