Resolute Acclaim 1996?

webbie Posted By webbie, Mar 22, 2006 at 1:21 AM

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. webbie

    webbie
    Seasoned Moderator 2.
    NULL
    
    Staff Member

    Nov 17, 2005
    12,184
    1,086
    Loc:
    Western Mass.
    Here is an old picture - has to be about 1996 because Andrea (r) is now 28 and David is almost 21. The stove is a Resolute Acclaim and the pic was taken with my first digital camera - a Kodak DC50. Quality sucks, and this is at full resolution.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Corie

    Corie
    Minister of Fire 2.
    NULL
    

    Nov 18, 2005
    2,430
    1
    Loc:
    Halifax, VA
    Not trying to a smart ash Craig, but I never realized digital camera's went back that far!
     
  3. DonCT

    DonCT
    Minister of Fire 2.
    NULL
    

    Dec 9, 2005
    609
    0
    Loc:
    Bristol, Connecticut
    That was back when they probably stored the pictures on a 5" floppy :p
     
  4. webbie

    webbie
    Seasoned Moderator 2.
    NULL
    
    Staff Member

    Nov 17, 2005
    12,184
    1,086
    Loc:
    Western Mass.
    Oh yee of little faith:

    http://tinyurl.com/fvgoe

    It was 756 x 504 (1/3 of a megapixel) with built in 1 meg memory(could store 12-50 pics) and even flash. Automatic focus and serial connection to the computer which actually worked at certain times!

    I took a lot of pics with it, including many of the first ones on this site as well as a lot which I placed on one of my local hobby sites.

    I even learned to do 360 degree panoramas with it! I'll post some when I find them.....


    Here are some other shots I took with it....(only the listed ones)
    http://www.hearth.com/hcc/pics/pages/sugarbush.html
    http://www.hearth.com/hcc/pics/pages/flowers.html
    http://www.hearth.com/hcc/pics/pages/bikecopy2.html
    http://www.hearth.com/hcc/pics/pages/field.html
    http://www.hearth.com/hcc/pics/pages/fall2.html
     
  5. fbelec

    fbelec
    Minister of Fire 2.
    NULL
    

    Nov 23, 2005
    1,958
    78
    Loc:
    northern massachusetts
    that camera did very well.
    it must have been close to top of the line in it's day?
     
  6. webbie

    webbie
    Seasoned Moderator 2.
    NULL
    
    Staff Member

    Nov 17, 2005
    12,184
    1,086
    Loc:
    Western Mass.
    Actually, just about the ONLY in it's line. As I remember, Apple had one of the first - the Quicktake, which was also made by Kodak - mine was directly made by Kodak and a little better than the Quicktake.

    Here's some DP history:
    http://tinyurl.com/qwc7n

    It had quite a bad shutter delay, so forget abour action shots!

    I think I paid 969. for it at some mail order outfit. Sold it for 30 bucks or so on eBay...

    My main camera now is a 5 year old Sony - 5 megpixels with the long lens - I really like it except for the weight if you are a tourist. It can get crazy reading online reviews and deciding on a camera! You really have to come up with a list of what exactly you need. In this case, what sold me was the ability of this camera to take pics in very low light with the flash off - great for a lot of situations where you want accurate color and also not to make a big fuss.

    I also have a little Canon that fits in the pocket.

    My next camera - although I'll probably keep the two I have - will have:
    1. 10x OPTICAL zoom - I like to photograph wildlife/nature and this helps.
    2. A really good burst mode - meaning it can take 10 pics or so in 2 seconds with one press of the button.
     
  7. fbelec

    fbelec
    Minister of Fire 2.
    NULL
    

    Nov 23, 2005
    1,958
    78
    Loc:
    northern massachusetts
    ya know it's funny. once you step up to the 5 pixel sony it's a whole different camera.
    my camera is a 3 year old 3.2 pixel sony and you have to wait a month of sundays for the flash to recharge. cost me $360.00 but it's great outside. my father inlaw has the 5 pixel sony. it looks like mine but charges the flash in a flash and of course takes a better pictures. i think he paid $300.00. mine also fools people. when your about to take a flash picture and people pose, then you press the button the camera pulse flashes and people think your done, a second go's by then a regular flash and it takes the picture. by then people have already moved. hugh pain.
     
  8. webbie

    webbie
    Seasoned Moderator 2.
    NULL
    
    Staff Member

    Nov 17, 2005
    12,184
    1,086
    Loc:
    Western Mass.
    I'm sure you have tried this, but if you use a better battery (assuming you use disposables), the flash will work better. If it already is using a rechargeable...well, then you are out of luck. That's why we have family - to pass those suckers on and get a new one!
     
  9. fbelec

    fbelec
    Minister of Fire 2.
    NULL
    

    Nov 23, 2005
    1,958
    78
    Loc:
    northern massachusetts
    it came with rechargeable. i tried duracell alkalines figuring that the higher voltage might help. no such luck. so i bought higher amp hour rechargeable. same. oh well
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page