We are newbies in this forum, but have been wood burners for 27 years.
We currently are using a 1980-era Jotul 118 (great stove) and until a few weeks ago a 1980-era Upland 207. The Upland developed hairline cracks in the back cast iron. We had it welded once, but the cracks appeared again. We then placed boilerplate inside the stove, in front of the back panel and held to internal spindles, covering it almost entirely. The cracks expanded again (2 of them about 6"), so we decided to replace.
We live in Central NY -- and have fairly cold, but not always frigid winters. We easily heated 1700 sf upstairs with the Upland and 1000 sf in the insulated walk-out basement with the Jotul. Walls are R-19 and ceilings R-30 or higher. The house is reasonably tight. The dual-flue masonry chimney run is 25' from the upstairs and 32' from the basement. Draft has never been a problem.
We fully expected that with EPA rules, "new" stoves would be very different to operate. We also expected greater efficiency as a result of more clean burning.
In looking at replacements for the Upland, we considered the Jotul Oslo, Quadrafire Cumberland and Morso 3610. The Morso won and now we wonder if we lost... Unfortunately, it is impossible to know how a stove will perform until you bring it home and actually use it. We really didn't see any negative information about the 3610.
Comments on the following would be much appreciated:
1. We have found the 3610 fire starting more difficult than the 2 older stoves. A very large pile of kindling is necessary. The front door needs to be left ajar for 15 minutes at least. It is half and hour, minimum, to "get going" and a hour before there is real heating.
2. We are using more wood than the Upland required -- it seems the 3610 firebox needs a pretty full load to burn well. Is this a characteristic of "new" stove designs in general?
3. Loading almost always puts as least a little smoke into the room, even when the draft is shut down and all air is drawn from the door opening.
4. If we add wood to it during the night, we have to stay up at least half an hour to make sure it gets going, and then listen to it making all kinds of noises and finally readjust the main draft. The times we have added wood over night were such a hassle, we won't bother doing that anymore -- the choice is letting it burn out completely (and face the hassle of a cold start in the morning) or putting in a huge load overnight, which is feasible or desirable only on nights below 10F. Is this Morso-specific, or "new" stoves in general?
We are at the point wondering whether we should pull the old Upland apart and have the hairline cracks re-welded or possibly search out another type of fix. We burned it with the cracks for several years.
Any comments or advice or the Morso 3610 would be appreciated!
We currently are using a 1980-era Jotul 118 (great stove) and until a few weeks ago a 1980-era Upland 207. The Upland developed hairline cracks in the back cast iron. We had it welded once, but the cracks appeared again. We then placed boilerplate inside the stove, in front of the back panel and held to internal spindles, covering it almost entirely. The cracks expanded again (2 of them about 6"), so we decided to replace.
We live in Central NY -- and have fairly cold, but not always frigid winters. We easily heated 1700 sf upstairs with the Upland and 1000 sf in the insulated walk-out basement with the Jotul. Walls are R-19 and ceilings R-30 or higher. The house is reasonably tight. The dual-flue masonry chimney run is 25' from the upstairs and 32' from the basement. Draft has never been a problem.
We fully expected that with EPA rules, "new" stoves would be very different to operate. We also expected greater efficiency as a result of more clean burning.
In looking at replacements for the Upland, we considered the Jotul Oslo, Quadrafire Cumberland and Morso 3610. The Morso won and now we wonder if we lost... Unfortunately, it is impossible to know how a stove will perform until you bring it home and actually use it. We really didn't see any negative information about the 3610.
Comments on the following would be much appreciated:
1. We have found the 3610 fire starting more difficult than the 2 older stoves. A very large pile of kindling is necessary. The front door needs to be left ajar for 15 minutes at least. It is half and hour, minimum, to "get going" and a hour before there is real heating.
2. We are using more wood than the Upland required -- it seems the 3610 firebox needs a pretty full load to burn well. Is this a characteristic of "new" stove designs in general?
3. Loading almost always puts as least a little smoke into the room, even when the draft is shut down and all air is drawn from the door opening.
4. If we add wood to it during the night, we have to stay up at least half an hour to make sure it gets going, and then listen to it making all kinds of noises and finally readjust the main draft. The times we have added wood over night were such a hassle, we won't bother doing that anymore -- the choice is letting it burn out completely (and face the hassle of a cold start in the morning) or putting in a huge load overnight, which is feasible or desirable only on nights below 10F. Is this Morso-specific, or "new" stoves in general?
We are at the point wondering whether we should pull the old Upland apart and have the hairline cracks re-welded or possibly search out another type of fix. We burned it with the cracks for several years.
Any comments or advice or the Morso 3610 would be appreciated!