What is the advantage of an OAK? The thing I was told is,if the house isn't exactly air tight you won't need one. Is this correct?
hooter04 said:What is the advantage of an OAK? The thing I was told is,if the house isn't exactly air tight you won't need one. Is this correct?
hooter04 said:My qustion has been answered.
John97 said:hooter04 said:My qustion has been answered.
Someone's gotta ask... Are you adding an OAK?
DexterDay said:Lots to read...... How far did you get before your decision? I want to heat the rooms of my house. Not pull cold air into them... I OAK.... Do you?
imacman said:Goo Goo, IMO, the OAK will help by not pulling MORE cold air in through the "cracks & crevices" that older leaky homes have. The leakier the home, the easier it is for a stove with no OAK to create a continuous vacuum in the house by pulling cold air in from outside, instead of through the OAK.
Is the older leaky home still going to have some drafts??? Yes, but the OAK should make the pellet stove NOT one of the contributors to the problem. Without the OAK, you are also using already heated air (that you already paid to heat once) for the combustion, and then sending that $$ right up the exhaust.
IMO, there is no downside to having an OAK....either for a leaky or a tight house. Most stove companies now recommend having one.
DexterDay said:imacman said:Goo Goo, IMO, the OAK will help by not pulling MORE cold air in through the "cracks & crevices" that older leaky homes have. The leakier the home, the easier it is for a stove with no OAK to create a continuous vacuum in the house by pulling cold air in from outside, instead of through the OAK.
Is the older leaky home still going to have some drafts??? Yes, but the OAK should make the pellet stove NOT one of the contributors to the problem. Without the OAK, you are also using already heated air (that you already paid to heat once) for the combustion, and then sending that $$ right up the exhaust.
IMO, there is no downside to having an OAK....either for a leaky or a tight house. Most stove companies now recommend having one.
To add a little bit on imacmans and answer your question about the "microclimate" inside your home. Your stove will still create convection and that will naturally warm the areas of the home. But it will do it much faster with an OAK installed. Now you are just heating your house. Rather than trying to heat it, and cool it (cold air through leaks) at the same time.
Efficiency will always increase with an OAK. Many Nay-sayers will say otherwise, but if you never OAK'd, then you never know. I went without one for a bit and quickly installed. Large difference in my opinion. I doubt there will be any disappointment. You will wonder why you didnt do it sooner.
hooter04 said:Thats the thing,I want to heat the,rooms and not pull the cold air into the rooms. I probably won't install this year,but I'll do it next year for sure.
Threerun said:I've got about the same problem- I would run an OAK however the pellet stove is in the basement, which is finished, and it's a poured concrete wall behind it. So I would have to either run an OAK pipe up the inside wall 4' (visible) and then out to ground level OR run the OAK straight out, then plumb a line through soil and have it pop out at ground level.
Option 2 is the cleanest looking, but man. What a PITA.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.