I have been lurking for a while, and this really is a great place for information and experience.
My house is 2000 sqft, well insulated, built in 1997, very open floor plan, located on a hill with no wind block (it sees very high winds), and is pretty energy efficient. However with price of propane getting close to $3.00 a gallon, we are looking at other options to heat the entire house. Our choices so far, are the Osburn and Napoleon (we are not set on these brands but for the price they seem hard to beat), Osburn 2300 (2300 sqft), Osburn 2400 (2700 sqft), Napoleon 1400 (2000+ sqft), , and Napoleon 1900 (3500 sqft), . My first thoughts are buy the one with the largest fire box. but and following that logic the Napoleon 1900, Osburn 2300, and the Osburn 2400 all have comparable sized fire boxes, not sure why the Osburn 2300 and Osburn 2400 are rated for less square footage than the Napoleon 1900 since they have larger fire boxes. But with the larger fire boxes our hopes are to get longer burns.
One concern would be that the larger stoves (Osburn 2400 and Napoleon 1900) would run us out of the house even on low, or since it is running on low not burn efficiently. So would the 1400 and the Osburn 2300 but enough stove to heat the house to 70 F with outside temp down to 5 F? Typically the weathe is not that low and many times the outside temp is between 32 f to 50 F. Is there an advantage or disadvantage to buying a larger stove and running it at low setting to get long burns? Or would one of the smaller two stoves (Osburn 2300 and the Napoleon 1400) meet our needs and give us long burn times (overnight) and still effectively heat the house.
I know there are lots of opinions out there and really would like to hear all that are willing to share. We would like this to be a good experience with no regrets. Locally I do have access to Quadra Fire, PE, Hearthstone (nice but expensive), Lopi, Dutchwest, Buck, Canyon, and Kuma. I have looked at most of them, and for the price the the Osburn's and Napoleon's offer the most stove for the money. Maybe Dutchwest is less expensive but not really something we looking at.
Rear clearance is some what of a concern, we definitely can deal with the 6", and are willing to deal with the 12" clearance of the larger two stoves it really just depends on the pros vs cons.
Thank you for taking the time to read this post and respond.
aussieblake
My house is 2000 sqft, well insulated, built in 1997, very open floor plan, located on a hill with no wind block (it sees very high winds), and is pretty energy efficient. However with price of propane getting close to $3.00 a gallon, we are looking at other options to heat the entire house. Our choices so far, are the Osburn and Napoleon (we are not set on these brands but for the price they seem hard to beat), Osburn 2300 (2300 sqft), Osburn 2400 (2700 sqft), Napoleon 1400 (2000+ sqft), , and Napoleon 1900 (3500 sqft), . My first thoughts are buy the one with the largest fire box. but and following that logic the Napoleon 1900, Osburn 2300, and the Osburn 2400 all have comparable sized fire boxes, not sure why the Osburn 2300 and Osburn 2400 are rated for less square footage than the Napoleon 1900 since they have larger fire boxes. But with the larger fire boxes our hopes are to get longer burns.
One concern would be that the larger stoves (Osburn 2400 and Napoleon 1900) would run us out of the house even on low, or since it is running on low not burn efficiently. So would the 1400 and the Osburn 2300 but enough stove to heat the house to 70 F with outside temp down to 5 F? Typically the weathe is not that low and many times the outside temp is between 32 f to 50 F. Is there an advantage or disadvantage to buying a larger stove and running it at low setting to get long burns? Or would one of the smaller two stoves (Osburn 2300 and the Napoleon 1400) meet our needs and give us long burn times (overnight) and still effectively heat the house.
I know there are lots of opinions out there and really would like to hear all that are willing to share. We would like this to be a good experience with no regrets. Locally I do have access to Quadra Fire, PE, Hearthstone (nice but expensive), Lopi, Dutchwest, Buck, Canyon, and Kuma. I have looked at most of them, and for the price the the Osburn's and Napoleon's offer the most stove for the money. Maybe Dutchwest is less expensive but not really something we looking at.
Rear clearance is some what of a concern, we definitely can deal with the 6", and are willing to deal with the 12" clearance of the larger two stoves it really just depends on the pros vs cons.
Thank you for taking the time to read this post and respond.
aussieblake