I honestly can't say because with oil I never dared to try and keep my house at 72-74 deg.pellets are going up
My daughter couldn't afford the oil heat at her house easily last year and kept the house down around 63. She loved coming here to the stove heat that she remembers growing up to. A bit different now with the pellet stove vs coal stove but similar concept. So now they have moved, the new house has an option to buy. She says first thing they are getting once it's their house is a stove. So sometimes there is another kind of comfort in burning stoves than saving money alone. I know the concept generally is that though, saving money. When oil prices are up pellets are cheaper and coal cheaper yet. It's still nice having a productive fire in the house and it works well in our house. Upstairs is a bit cooler than down, we all have been used to sleeping that way. The living room is mighty inviting on a cold winter day. My adult daughter walks in, sheds her outer wear, kicks off her shoes and sucks that heat up on the couch ! I think I would keep it at 74 just to see her do that like she did as a kid !!Around me oil can be had for $2.87 anything north of $330 a ton makes them pretty equal on a BTU basis. But that comparison would only be valid if you had a oil stove in the middle of your house like you do a pellet stove.
Take into account a old heating system or one that is installed improperly or grossly oversize and who knows what price is break even. A lot of folks also don't heat there whole house with a stove they deal with cold rooms and accept it because they are saving money. That said if I still burned oil Id probably opt for oil at these prices it was far more comfortable even if did cost a couple hundred more a winter.
Thank you. If only more people used their magical little friend, the brain. And maybe a calculator - either the handheld kind or even better, an online model (free) that will even factor in system efficiency. I read your response and thought, "Yes, there is still hope".Ok so first off there is too many factors (efficiencies of equipment, system eff., .....) to make this perfect. This is just an estimation.
BUT if you just take in consideration the BTUs of the source and do not put efficiency of equipment. The assumption I used was 8000 btu/lb for pellets and 138800 btu/gal for oil you get approximately 115.3 gallons of oil to a ton of pellets. below is a chart to illustrate. If oil is $2/gal and pellets are $250/ton buy oil. If oil is $3.20/gal and pellets are $350/ton buy pellets.
View attachment 141909
+1Thank you. If only more people used their magical little friend, the brain. And maybe a calculator - either the handheld kind or even better, an online model (free) that will even factor in system efficiency. I read your response and thought, "Yes, there is still hope".
pellets are going up
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.