Good thoughts by all. *~<
<---- me with my night cap on posting on Hearth at 2:30 AM.......
Sizing factors I consider:
1. I'll still go with the heat loss because that's the baseline for all other calculations regarding boiler size, pipe and tube size, pumps, additional emitters etc etc.
Without it you're just guessing. Maybe with experience and good back ground behind it. But still guessing.
2. Many times I''ll measure up the emitters in the case of rads or baseboard to see what is actually installed. Cant tell you how many times I've seen 60,000 btu worth of baseboard hooked up to a 150K or larger boiler. If you know what the
system can transfer you can peg the boiler size pretty close just with that based on whether the occupant says "it heats great" or, "It don't heat".
3. A good question to have answered is if there are any plans for expansion of the structure or things like pools and hot tubs also.
4. Throw in a factor for DHW and you can get pretty close with just # 2&3.
As to sizing smaller with wood....... As you have seen a Deep Portage Jim, design heat loss constitutes around less than 5% of the heating season. Often times it is far less expensive to go with a wood boiler that will do the job 80-90% of the time and use a couple Eden Pure type electric heaters or equivalent in cold spots for peak heating load.
This is especially true when no storage is used or anticipated.
The thing with gas or oil fired boilers is the ability to go instantly ON and instantly OFF.
With a wood boiler you have no such luxury.
If you want a good clean burn you are going have to add a zone or tank which can absorb extra output during times when the full capacity is not needed. People are learning this simple truth, usually by having to figure it out themselves but sometimes through their own fact finding mission. Using a dump zone to keep output in line with actual load can lead to much wasted wood and work.
Was yakking with Mark Odell from Econoburn a while back and he told me when they started shipping virtually none of the boilers went out with a storage or buffer tank in the design. Now nearly 80% of them do if I recall that conversation correctly.......... That should be a pretty good indication of how thermal storage is begniing to seep into the collective conscience of the wood burning community and that is a good thing the way I see it.