Hi - I am going to install a high-efficiency wood-burning fireplace (with an OAK) in a weekend home in the casktill moutians of NY. the installation is on an interior wall with the chimney snaking up various closet areas. this is really a 1.5 story building so there is no attic to speak of. i am concerned that when the unit is not working, that the cold air will come down the flue, can cause the fireplace/chimney to act like a giant cooling unit. The fireplace doors will be closed, so the cold air will not physically leak into the house, but the unit and chimney will "probably" get very cold and hence cool the house.
So how is this related to cat vs non-cat? I believe most cat's use a damper-like device to force the combustion gases to go through the cat, which is a much more difficult path for the air to traverse (if i open the fireplace doors with the cat engaged all the smoke comes out, whereas this does not happen is the cat is not engaged). so, i am thinking that when i am away, i should leave the cat engaged, and that should significantly diminish the amount of air that is moving through the OAK-fireplace-chimney system and hence not cool off the house as much.
the equivalent thing for a non-cat is to close the air-supply as much as possible, but i read that some units won't let you do that completely, and it still leaves the entire firebox full of cold air, i.e. more surface area for the cold to exchange with the interior of the house.
it seems to me that the cat will do a better job at preventing the house from getting colder while the unit is not used. does this sounds reasonable?
a similar concern about the the chimney. i have narrowed down my choice to the BIS Tradition/Lennox Montecito Estate with their insulated pipe or the VC Sequoia II cat which uses their triple wall air cooled pipe. the insulated pipe "should" conduct less cold into the house simply because its 11" diameter whereas the VC pipe is 13" diameter (the VC pipe has 18% more surface area for conduction).
i don't want the fireplace to act as a "air-conditioner" in the winter when its not being used. i have read (or heard) of some fireplaces where the cold air is pouring out of the fireplace vents when its not used and the people have to cover it with a blanket!
thx -yurij
So how is this related to cat vs non-cat? I believe most cat's use a damper-like device to force the combustion gases to go through the cat, which is a much more difficult path for the air to traverse (if i open the fireplace doors with the cat engaged all the smoke comes out, whereas this does not happen is the cat is not engaged). so, i am thinking that when i am away, i should leave the cat engaged, and that should significantly diminish the amount of air that is moving through the OAK-fireplace-chimney system and hence not cool off the house as much.
the equivalent thing for a non-cat is to close the air-supply as much as possible, but i read that some units won't let you do that completely, and it still leaves the entire firebox full of cold air, i.e. more surface area for the cold to exchange with the interior of the house.
it seems to me that the cat will do a better job at preventing the house from getting colder while the unit is not used. does this sounds reasonable?
a similar concern about the the chimney. i have narrowed down my choice to the BIS Tradition/Lennox Montecito Estate with their insulated pipe or the VC Sequoia II cat which uses their triple wall air cooled pipe. the insulated pipe "should" conduct less cold into the house simply because its 11" diameter whereas the VC pipe is 13" diameter (the VC pipe has 18% more surface area for conduction).
i don't want the fireplace to act as a "air-conditioner" in the winter when its not being used. i have read (or heard) of some fireplaces where the cold air is pouring out of the fireplace vents when its not used and the people have to cover it with a blanket!
thx -yurij