Choosing a Saw - What's important?

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.
rayburn said:
I recomend the stihl ms361. Great saw, plenty of power, not overly heavy to cut with all day,and its built to last. I also got the model with the quick adjust and I love it. :)

I think, but am not sure, all the Stihl 361s have the quick adjust. (I have one, by the way.)

I'll go along with rayburn's assessment on the saw. It's an incredible tool.
 
From the OP:
Most of my stuff is around 16” or less, especially if clearing junk trees to help the healthy, native stuff. However, I do find occasional downed trees that are 24” inches around at the base, so hacking off the stump requires a lot of moving around to get the bar through.

I have a Dolmar 7900 because I occasionally run into rounds that need a big (28") bar to cut up, but it is more saw than I need for 90% of my wood - it's a blast to drop it through a smaller log, but still overkill... I have only used my big bar on it a couple times, most of my cutting I do with a 20" bar, and find that is about the perfect size for good handling and balance. A 20" bar is at the bottom end of what the 7900 can handle, but is fine on a smaller saw as well. If I hadn't been trying to do the "one saw" approach (and just use my Pull-on for rescue and limbing) I would have gotten the 5100.

If the OP is describing his wood properly, he should be fine with an 18 - 20" bar, or possibly even a shorter bar (and a 14-16" bar would probably make that Poulan Pro into a much better cutting machine!) as that would be longer than most of his wood, and well within range of the rest... This makes me think that he really doesn't NEED a 7900, and that a Dolmar 5100 would do the job quite well, for significantly less up front money, and less weight in the field. I reccomend the Dolmar, not only because it's a good saw in it's own right, but because it's MUCH less expensive than the comparable Husky and Stihl models, and I don't see anything those offer to justify the higher price other than a name on the side, and I don't pay for labels...

IMHO a decent OPE guy should be able to fix any brand saw if need be, assuming I can't fix it myself, and with the internet I don't think parts availability is that big of a deal either - so I'm not all that worried about having a local dealer - rates as nice, but not essential, especially if the saw makers would come into the 20th century and allow online sales...

Gooserider
 
Thanks to everyone who provided input and guidance. After weighing the pros/cons I went with a Dolmar PS6400. It had plenty of power for most of the cutting I figured I would be doing and, according to the shop owner, the 64, 73 and 7900 are actually all the same chassis and design but with different cylinders and perhaps carb. So, in theory, if I wanted in a few years, I could "upgrade" it to a more powerful saw. I took it for a test drive last Saturday and needless to say I was impressed. It screamed through cuts in a fraction of the time it took my pull-on.
 
My '7900' is actually a 64 upgraded by eric ritchey. Still has the makita blue plastics and 6401 label, by my choice, nice little 'sleeper' saw that cuts really well.
If you choose to upgrade someday, Baileys is prototyping an aftermarket 85 or 86 cc big bore kit. Now that would be a real kicking saw..... especially hiding in your makita 64 cc plastics.....


kcj
 
blueridgelvr said:
Thanks to everyone who provided input and guidance. After weighing the pros/cons I went with a Dolmar PS6400. It had plenty of power for most of the cutting I figured I would be doing and, according to the shop owner, the 64, 73 and 7900 are actually all the same chassis and design but with different cylinders and perhaps carb. So, in theory, if I wanted in a few years, I could "upgrade" it to a more powerful saw. I took it for a test drive last Saturday and needless to say I was impressed. It screamed through cuts in a fraction of the time it took my pull-on.

Good saw... According to the parts list on my 7900, which covers all three saws, the carb is the same on both. The ONLY difference is the piston and cylinder, thus the upgrade is quite possible and straightforward, many folks have done it, no problems...

Gooserider
 
Didn't read them all:
You need to decide if you want one saw or two. If one, I'd recommend a 361 with about a 20" bar (can cut almost 40" and that is HUGE). If you are going two saws, I'd go either a Husky 375 or the Solo 681 and something in the 260 range. I've cut plenty with a small tophandle saw with a 12" bar and it works very well for alot of tops.
Decide what you want for the cut range and go from there, trust me you don't want to run a huge saw for your all day cutting.
Chad
 
Status
Not open for further replies.