Shortly after we moved in we hired a company for sweep + inspection on the chimney servicing our wood stove which turned up a few issues. On the maintenance end the crown needs to be replaced and the top few rows of brick relaid. On the code front I was told I needed an insulated liner due to wood frame clearance, and that my chimney was a foot too short and needed to be extended to 3ft.
At this point I'm gotten quotes from 2 masons for the chimney repair and tomorrow I'll have quotes from two sweeps.
Both sweeps have told me that what the inspector said isn't true in Massachusetts and since my chimney is at the peak of the roof 2ft is to code. I'd love to believe them and save myself a bit of money, but I want to make sure when we get stove replaced after the repair we will be good with the installer, town inspector and our home insurance.
Anyone know if this is a common way the 3-2-10 rule is interpreted? Either in Massachusetts specifically or in general?
At this point I'm gotten quotes from 2 masons for the chimney repair and tomorrow I'll have quotes from two sweeps.
Both sweeps have told me that what the inspector said isn't true in Massachusetts and since my chimney is at the peak of the roof 2ft is to code. I'd love to believe them and save myself a bit of money, but I want to make sure when we get stove replaced after the repair we will be good with the installer, town inspector and our home insurance.
Anyone know if this is a common way the 3-2-10 rule is interpreted? Either in Massachusetts specifically or in general?