Hello
Here is the latest
https://cfpub.epa.gov/oarweb/woodstove/index.cfm?fuseaction=app.searchResults
Here is the latest
https://cfpub.epa.gov/oarweb/woodstove/index.cfm?fuseaction=app.searchResults
Thanks for explaining that!The list posts all wood heaters legal to sell in the USA until May 15, 2020. This means the list includes stoves tested prior to March 16, 2015 that are under 4.5 gr/hr. Stoves tested when the new rule was introduced, are now required to test to specific test methods in the rule. Example, for cordwood burning heaters, Method 28R.
If you look closely at the list, there is a column for whether or not a heater meets the full requirements of 2020 (furthest to the right). A few months ago, that list totaled 38 wood and pellet heaters.
You have to be very careful how you sort the data, lest you exclude some heaters.
Here is the list starting with the cleanest......
https://cfpub.epa.gov/oarweb/woodstove/index.cfm?fuseaction=app.searchresults&manufacturersid=0&heatoutputupper=100000&heatoutputlower=0&lu_appliancetypesid=0&lu_appliancesubtypesid=0&lu_fueltypesid=0&recs2display=10&emissionrate=0 grams/hr - 10 grams/hr&efficiencytested=0 - 100&bturange=0 BTUs - 100000 BTUs&z_outofproduction=0&searchterms=&searchtype=advanced&sortby=EmisRateSort
What a shockerHere are the 2 certified forced air wood furnaces...and word on the street is that the first one on the list has to retest due to not meeting the full requirements of the test parameters.
View attachment 246259
This list is US EPA and only affects USA...although I am sure that they would love to take over the world...Is there a chance that my city will request that I change my wood stove even though the 30.1 is below 1g/h?
The 30.1 was tested to method 28 in 2014. The 30.2 was tested to method 28R. R means revised.I wonder why the Blaze King Ashford 30.1 doesn’t meet the 2020 requirements and the 30.2 does. Is there a chance that my city will request that I change my wood stove even though the 30.1 is below 1g/h?
Not completely accurate. Several provinces in Canada adhere to EPA regulations. Most abide by EPA requirements, a couple do not.This list is US EPA and only affects USA...although I am sure that they would love to take over the world...
Do you guys have strict stove emissions regs there?
Maybe this is the case because it’s a city. Honestly, I imagine there’s worse culprits of air pollution other than wood stoves there, but I could be wrong.In Montreal we had a new regulation prohibiting since October 1st 2018 the use of wood stoves not certified by CSA/B415.1-10 or having emissions above 2,5 g/h unless there is a power outage for more than 3 hours. The use of any wood stoves is prohibited if there is a smog alert.
It makes sense to only test the latest version. Even if prior versions pass, there is no point in going to the high expense of testing if they are no longer sold.I wonder why the Blaze King Ashford 30.1 doesn’t meet the 2020 requirements and the 30.2 does. Is there a chance that my city will request that I change my wood stove even though the 30.1 is below 1g/h?
Thank you...I'm very familiar with those regulations and it's always a great idea to share restrictions such as yours. A great number of visitors to this site look for just this type of information.In Montreal we had a new regulation prohibiting since October 1st 2018 the use of wood stoves not certified by CSA/B415.1-10 or having emissions above 2,5 g/h unless there is a power outage for more than 3 hours. The use of any wood stoves is prohibited if there is a smog alert.
Is there any other places in North America banning the use of wood stoves in a similar way to Montreal? In the rest of Quebec there is no such laws as far as I know.
Yes, some of them are inversion bowls created by our local topography. And our cities and marine traffic create a lot of pollution that gets trapped in this bowl. It amazes me how on a clear winter day I can look at Rainier and see a blanket of smog sitting around the base. Libby, MT has a similar issue. Rural Darrington is one of the worst in WA state.It’s not just cities either but huge swaths or rural land like 100 miles from the cities that get lumped into our western Washington burn bans.
Yes, some of them are inversion bowls created by our local topography. And our cities and marine traffic create a lot of pollution that gets trapped in this bowl. It amazes me how on a clear winter day I can look at Rainier and see a blanket of smog sitting around the base. Libby, MT has a similar issue. Rural Darrington is one of the worst in WA state.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.