Consider my comments are as much for those following the thread as for you.
The whole grounding/bonding thing makes my head hurt and I swear even the licensed pros cant agree. I do have taller trees and a nearby utility power line in the street so its likely I will not get a direct strike but could get a reflected strike. My theory is I want to put as much energy from a strike into the local ground rod and keep it from getting into the house wiring. My pole and my frame is grounded to a local ground rod and then my DC lines go through a midnight solar surge suppression device (SPD) mounted at the local disconnect switch on the pole and the SPD output is connected to the local ground rod. I then tied the local ground rod to a #4 copper that runs in the same trench as the conduit. It ties into my main ground outside the house near my meter. I have an artesian well with 60 feet of casing that is also tied into the main house ground (my suspicion is the well casing probably has the lowest ground resistance)The theory is any strike will go directly down into the ground at the pole and the SPD will hopefully catch any surge from getting into the DC wiring to my inverter. Tying the local ground rod to the house ground assures that the surge doesn't decide to use my DC wiring to get to the house ground rod which has a lower potential. My understanding is if the panels need to be bonded to the house system it would require an additional wire in the conduit which would eventually tie into the main power panel where the tie to the main ground rod is made. So my guess is with your panels you do not need to bond them but you do need to ground them.
Lightning has been a problem here. Its taken out our underground dog containment system several times. I've had a strike hit the top of a cedar only 20 ft. away as I was standing with my wife on a boulder. I stood, awed and by the time I turned to my wife she was nearly to the house. I've also been shocked while doing plumbing work in our house during a thunderstorm. I've installed whole-house surge protection system.
I agree on the complexity of grounding/bonding and that panels should at least be grounded locally but maybe not bonded to the house wiring. For now, I plan to follow inverter maker's recommendations. They claim that spike suppression is built into their system and adding bonding or spike protection will only cause problems. I have oversized all the conduit so extra conductors can be added as needed.
One minor issue that may not apply down in Virginia is that in our area we cannot put in rigid conduit from above ground to underground unless we put in slip couplings so that if the soil moves relative to the building that the conduit doesn't get stressed. In your case it would be at the house only as your conduit goes into the footing at the array. We also have to go with a thicker wall PVC conduit where its exposed near the ground (or put in steel).
Slip joints were considered but not installed as frost depth over the last 10 years has not been much. Our design frost depth is 18 in. here. I did install the stronger schedule 80 aboveground as required by code.
Up north we need to get the footings down below frost line so we generally do not worry about wind uplift when sizing footings as 4' of soil on top of them provides plenty of anchorage. The frost line is at least 4' in my area (and the soil is even bonier than yours) . The normal goal is keep the footings deep and then just run sonotubes up above the frost line to reduce the amount of area that the frost can grab onto.
I started by trying to bore dig deeper holes with a tractor mounted post hole digger but large boulders stopped me. I rented an mini-excavator and dug some up and bonded the footer/curbs to them where they were to big to dig up. What you don't see in the photos is that each footer/curb either has deep holes at either end that reach well below frost depth or that large boulders there were anchored to.
It looks like your footings were sized with extra concrete to deal with wind uplift as you dont have any soil on top of them. In either case, the connection to the footing has to be designed for uplift as well as compression.
I built the footer/curbs with both upward and downward forces in mind. Its hard to tell but there is a total of 5 tons of concrete in the 3 footer/curbs. Each post is anchored using an embedded bolt and a hefty metal structural base. I've built it so that these posts can be raised later as needed to deal with any settling of the foundations. This structure is built on a slope so the footer/curbs will be used to retain gravel parking installed below the array.
I am curious how you are dealing with the lateral wind load. The posts look to be pin type connections so they dont provide a lot of side to side resistance. I see the angled box bean up high that presumably is a fixed connection that provides some lateral stiffness but since the sides of the structure are wide open I would normally end up wanting to put in some diagonal bracing to stiffen things up in the open bays. One option would be go with some galvanized cables making a big "X" on the open sides. Unless the cables are shiny, they would tend to visually blend in from a distance. The other way around for someones future project is turning the footing connections into fixed connections instead of pin connections by sinking some angle iron down into the footings sticking up a couple of feet and bolting the posts to the angle iron.
I've not shown any additional bracing in the sketch yet until I decide where and how to build it. I'd like leave the sides open if I can so I'm trying other ways of providing lateral stiffness. If the box beam and rafters are of sufficient strength and well connected their geometry as built should provide adequate support. I plan to add the tension cables you describe if needed. I frequently use metal pipe, strap, or wire rope in my projects for this sort of thing. I've already added some diagonal braces on the front and rear sides. I'll provide shots of those as things progress.
It does look like you thought it through and its going to nice looking result.
Its hard to imagine how much though goes into this sort of thing but it sounds like you've been there.
I've been planning PV solar since I was about 13
Many thanks for your detailed replies!