Long time lurker, 1st time poster. I have been considering heating with wood quite a while. My reasons would mainly be to save money and not feel as bad about keeping it a tad warmer in the house during winter. I have looked at so many different options ie. OWB ( if I can find a good used one still might go this route but a new one will take to long for payback IMO) I have looked at indoor gassifer in my unfinished basement attached to insulated ductwork. ( This is attractive because my basement is walkin and even has a garage door so it would be easy to bring anything in including water storage. etc. but it also gets pretty expensive) I have recently been considering putting an insert into an existing fireplace upstairs (have another fireplace in the unfinished basement but understand that a stove probably would not work to well down there.)
So here is todays question that someone here might could share their experienced opinion on. I have a Father in law that wants to remove a great looking Craftsman stove that is a pre EPA unit. Should I try this out to see if I even like heating with a stove and burning wood or take the plunge for a newer style stove that has big ol glass front so you can watch the burn? I would have to install an insulated liner either way so I know I am looking at around 500 to 700 for that and the install I can do myself. Do you think that the older stove would burn so much more wood that it would be aggrevating and turn me off wood burning altogether? I don't really cherish the idea of having to clean a liner more and burning twice as much wood. I have been looking at the following EPA stoves since I have a rather large space to heat and fairly open single level floorplan. (Osburn 2400, Large Drolet for Northern tool and a couple other 3.0 cu feet stoves.) The room that the stove would go in is about 450 sq feet with catherdral ceiling at 18 feet with a ceiling fan. The total square footage is about 2400 sq feet. I know how much everyone love pics and can take some when I get home.
Oh by the way the craftsman stove which is a large stove also has some stainless liner that I might could possibly reuse. I think it is the solid ss type that I might could add on to for height because its probably too short. This could cut down on cost of the trial wood experience.
Anyway thanks for all the great reading that yal have provided over the last few months, I can't wait to hear what you have to say.
So here is todays question that someone here might could share their experienced opinion on. I have a Father in law that wants to remove a great looking Craftsman stove that is a pre EPA unit. Should I try this out to see if I even like heating with a stove and burning wood or take the plunge for a newer style stove that has big ol glass front so you can watch the burn? I would have to install an insulated liner either way so I know I am looking at around 500 to 700 for that and the install I can do myself. Do you think that the older stove would burn so much more wood that it would be aggrevating and turn me off wood burning altogether? I don't really cherish the idea of having to clean a liner more and burning twice as much wood. I have been looking at the following EPA stoves since I have a rather large space to heat and fairly open single level floorplan. (Osburn 2400, Large Drolet for Northern tool and a couple other 3.0 cu feet stoves.) The room that the stove would go in is about 450 sq feet with catherdral ceiling at 18 feet with a ceiling fan. The total square footage is about 2400 sq feet. I know how much everyone love pics and can take some when I get home.

Oh by the way the craftsman stove which is a large stove also has some stainless liner that I might could possibly reuse. I think it is the solid ss type that I might could add on to for height because its probably too short. This could cut down on cost of the trial wood experience.
Anyway thanks for all the great reading that yal have provided over the last few months, I can't wait to hear what you have to say.