We just sold our beloved Dutchwest wood stove, fixing to get a pellet. So far, it looks to us like the Harman XXV and Quad Mt. Vernon AE are the heavy hitters on the traditional style freestanding stove market right now. We looked at the Harman and I thought I was attracted to the bottom feed (freedom of pellet choice) but the temperature control system was unimpressive, as demonstrated by the dealer. It claims to hold any temp you tell it to. Big whoop. My toaster does that. The Harmon also looked crudely constructed with robot welds all over the place. In function, it looks like some kind of industrial heat treating plant.
Then we looked at the Quad. It is top feeding, but has an automatic pot cleaner, negating the advantage of the bottom feeding Harman. It also has an (just what I was looking for) electronic programmable temperature controller. I want to maintain minimum temps during the day while at work, and come home to a toasty house at 5. On the same controller, you can select what fuel you are burning. You can burn any fuel available for pellet stoves. You just scroll through a list and pick your fuel. It even differentiates between "utility pellets", "hardwood pellets", and "softwood pellets".
The Quad salesman also boasted about how this new Mt Vernon has been reduced in complexity and has a very short parts list, even compared to its older little brother, the Castile. Although I was fully aware to filter out all of the sales pitching, it sounds like Quadrafire is attempting to turn over a new leaf in its stove design with the Mt. Vernon. The electronic temp controller is a big thumbs up, as is the airfoil heat exchanger plate design. It also sounds daggone quiet in operation. It looks like a real nice little package.
I'd like to hear suggestions of competitive stoves and/or criticism of my impressions of the Harman and Quad. Please, don't hold back. I'm new to pellet stoves and need all the info I can get.
Chris P
Then we looked at the Quad. It is top feeding, but has an automatic pot cleaner, negating the advantage of the bottom feeding Harman. It also has an (just what I was looking for) electronic programmable temperature controller. I want to maintain minimum temps during the day while at work, and come home to a toasty house at 5. On the same controller, you can select what fuel you are burning. You can burn any fuel available for pellet stoves. You just scroll through a list and pick your fuel. It even differentiates between "utility pellets", "hardwood pellets", and "softwood pellets".
The Quad salesman also boasted about how this new Mt Vernon has been reduced in complexity and has a very short parts list, even compared to its older little brother, the Castile. Although I was fully aware to filter out all of the sales pitching, it sounds like Quadrafire is attempting to turn over a new leaf in its stove design with the Mt. Vernon. The electronic temp controller is a big thumbs up, as is the airfoil heat exchanger plate design. It also sounds daggone quiet in operation. It looks like a real nice little package.
I'd like to hear suggestions of competitive stoves and/or criticism of my impressions of the Harman and Quad. Please, don't hold back. I'm new to pellet stoves and need all the info I can get.
Chris P