Hello Katman,
I'm using cheap Honeywell Programmable Thermostats. Sorry, I don't know the model# off the top of my head. They are 5day-2day scheduled. I can't say I have strong bias on any Prog T-Sat's, or love the Honeywells that I have, they are what they are and seem to do the job of matching our life-style schedule.
Yes, the PB105 only has 1 Available aquastat well, located on top of the boiler, and that well MUST be used for the Harman Temperature probe. This means that any additional control aquatats you might add to your system are best "Strapped-On" to the boiler output pipe. This is typical for a PB105 Boiler install.
The problem with discussing controls details and plumbing is, the right controls depend on many issues :
- Multi-Boiler Plumbing design
- Existing Boiler system Design and Controls
- Expected level of automation, circulators -switches-valves, etc (Manual vs Auto).
You may have limited options, based on your existing boiler design (Zone Valves with 1 Circulator). Hooking the two boilers together in series is usually the easiest solution. Basically, NO controls or extra circulators required. Plug in the PB105 and let it maintain it's 160-180 temp with the factory on-board controls, and let the house circulate the water through both boilers using your existing circulator. The 100ft may be an issue and require an extra helper circulator ?
But, you don't talk about your DHW situation, so it's hard to know what all of the implications are for this design.. What's your DHW system like ?
I personally Do NOT like Series installs, because they are very inefficient ! When you run your Oil-Boiler, you must also heat the pellet boiler, and when you run your pellet boiler your also heating your Oil-Boiler. Yes, you can add manual valves to bypass the off boiler, but that gets to be a hack too ! I just dislike wasting energy and I hate manual intervention if I can avoid it by design.
I personally like Parallel System designs. However, most people hook them up with manual gate valves so that only 1 Boiler is driving the Boiler Zone Header at a time. This usually requires manual boiler switch over using gate valves. I struggled with these trade-offs myself and ended up with my current Parallel Design point, but I have a Circulator per zone, Indirect Hot-Water Tank (Not a Tankless-Coil), and wanted a system with no manual switch over and had NO LOSS when using 1 boiler, or the other. To accomplish this, I use Primary and Secondary Loops with 2 Swing Check Valves and 1 Weighted Check-Valve (IE: 2-Way Flow Control Valve). This puts the Hot Water right on the Header at the consuming zones, no matter which boiler is supplying the hot water, and there is always ZERO flow through the unused boiler, This results in a Fully Automatic switch-over (I do have gate valves for maintenance, but NO Manual Valves are needed for boiler switch over - just Turn-OFF the Pellet and the Oil is in the loop !) and has No Heat Loss in the unused boiler !
VT_Bubba