okarmo said:
Thanks to both posters. I am located in southwest Missouri. We actually removed the insert yesterday- What a job! My husband and I managed to hoist it onto a 2-wheeler and the poor wheels are now suffering. I listed it on Craigslist today for $100, but no interest yet.
Seems reasonable - good luck.
That is news to me that it is actually illegal to install in some areas, so thanks for that helpful piece of information. We have not tried to burn it. We tried to plug in the blowers, but then saw that the cord has been burned pretty severely so we are not sure whether it would even work. I also didn't realize that these stoves could put off harmful pollutants. If this had put out harmful materials in the past, will special precautions need to be taken in removing the pipe from the insert that still remains? (the pipe from the insert is comes down from our chimney, surrounded by what looks like insulation, and I 'm not sure of my husband's plan of how he will remove it- I'm assuming that this pipe does not go all the way up the chimney).
The problem isn't so much "what" the stove puts out as it is a question of "how much" it puts out - Sort of like cars - the new ones put out the same sorts of stuff, but just less of it. The stove and pipe shouldn't require anything drastic in the way of precautions - the creosote, which is the residue left by burning, is technically a mild carcinogen, so the suggestion of a dust mask is an excellent one, along with gloves, but there is no need for a "moon suit" or other drastic dealings - just try to contain the crud, don't breathe it, vacuum up afterwards and shower... Sweeps back in the bad old days of poor personal hygeine used to have a lot of problems, but reasonable cleaning and avoiding dust inhalation / ingestion wil handle it. Safety glasses are also an excellent idea on general principles.
As to the pipe that remains in the chimney - I wouldn't try removing it until you've had a sweep look at the situation - if it goes the length of the chimney, it might be re-useable if you put in a modern insert.
We were removing it simply because we prefer the ambiance of a fireplace without an insert. We definitely plan to have a professional out to check out the chimney before we ever build a fire. Our firebox seems really shallow to me and that makes me a bit nervous.
Thanks again for your responses...
It is possible that what you have is a "Rumsford" style fireplace - these were arguably the best design for a fire place in terms of heating ability, and were characterized by a very shallow, but fairly wide and tall firebox that was designed with the intent that the logs be stood on end and leaned against the back wall to burn. This was supposed to increase the radiant heat output of the fire, and improve the burning efficiency. Whle better than a conventional fireplace, they are still quite inefficient, and can lead to a net heat loss.
One thing that you may discover is that your chimney was modified when the insert was installed, and can no longer be used as a fireplace, or at least not without expensive repairs.
I would agree with the earlier comment about a modern insert being good for having the ambiance of a fireplace, due to their large glass doors. Some can be run with the doors open at a reduced efficiency, so you can get the best of both worlds.
Gooserider