I originally purchased an outdoor wood boiler because I was heating a some 4000 sq ft, leaking falling down home that I inherited from my grandfather. I was heating it with an ancient indoor forced air stove because I couldn't afford the $3000 a year it took to heat it conventionally with propane.
I set the house on fire on two different occasions with that junk furnace. I got out of college and was dirt dirt poor for many years but finally got a decent job and was able to get a loan for the outdoor wood boiler.
3 years later, I am rebuilding and rehabbing that home. Quite extensively. I have bare stud walls, and bare ceilings to fill with insulation. Ripping the second story off, changing rooflines, layouts, wiring etc.
Many people...home OWNERS... are encouraging me to have closed cell spray foam installed in the entire home.
My contractor and brother in law... people who WORK on homes, are trying to steer me away from it, due to:
-moisture mitigation issues (house needs to breathe)
-downline cost from requiring upgraded HVAC to deal with moisture and air stagnation issues in the home
-possible moisture issues on the OUTSIDE of the home (studs sheets rotting, nails rusting off etc)
-difficulty encountered when changing or repairing anything in-wall
-initial cost
The difference between spray foam and traditional insulation and fiberglass is potentially going to be 6-10,000. Fiberglass seems easy... Cheap, easy, conventional, tried and true. But the hours and hours of research I've done point to spray foam being such a superior insulation that there is no competition even.
I intend to live in this home for many years, perhaps forever, and I have an "inexpensive" method of heating the home, but I can never catch up cutting wood and am burning alot of unseasoned wood, construction scrap, paper etc (whatever fits in the door). I understand that better efficiency means less wood consumption. IN general, it will take much longer for the spray foam to pay off for me than it will for someone with a conventional fossil fuel or electric furnace, making it harder decision to make.
Any one have any input on this? What did you do during this design decision.
I set the house on fire on two different occasions with that junk furnace. I got out of college and was dirt dirt poor for many years but finally got a decent job and was able to get a loan for the outdoor wood boiler.
3 years later, I am rebuilding and rehabbing that home. Quite extensively. I have bare stud walls, and bare ceilings to fill with insulation. Ripping the second story off, changing rooflines, layouts, wiring etc.
Many people...home OWNERS... are encouraging me to have closed cell spray foam installed in the entire home.
My contractor and brother in law... people who WORK on homes, are trying to steer me away from it, due to:
-moisture mitigation issues (house needs to breathe)
-downline cost from requiring upgraded HVAC to deal with moisture and air stagnation issues in the home
-possible moisture issues on the OUTSIDE of the home (studs sheets rotting, nails rusting off etc)
-difficulty encountered when changing or repairing anything in-wall
-initial cost
The difference between spray foam and traditional insulation and fiberglass is potentially going to be 6-10,000. Fiberglass seems easy... Cheap, easy, conventional, tried and true. But the hours and hours of research I've done point to spray foam being such a superior insulation that there is no competition even.
I intend to live in this home for many years, perhaps forever, and I have an "inexpensive" method of heating the home, but I can never catch up cutting wood and am burning alot of unseasoned wood, construction scrap, paper etc (whatever fits in the door). I understand that better efficiency means less wood consumption. IN general, it will take much longer for the spray foam to pay off for me than it will for someone with a conventional fossil fuel or electric furnace, making it harder decision to make.
Any one have any input on this? What did you do during this design decision.