Like ctlovell, I'm looking to replace my Jotul Combifire #4. I'm thinking of an Englander Model 30, but here's my dilemma: the Combifire has problems, but it works. I'm concerned that a new stove will actually be a step in the wrong direction. In short, I'm looking for assurance from y'all that I'm not making a colossal error.
Here are my problems with the Combifire:
1. 3-4 hour burn times. My kids are out of diapers and sleep through the night now. I would like to be able to go 8 hours without having to feed the fire; I'm too old for this $*^&
2. Warped door. When it gets hot, gaps show up around the door, allowing too much air in. If a burning log touches the door, it warps enough that the door pops open a little. Not safe or efficient.
3. Efficiency. The damn thing's as old as me. It'd be nice not to burn so much $$$/wood...
Here's what's right about the Combifire:
1. Familiarity. I know how to start a fire in it. I know how to damp it down. There's a comfort level there...
2. Hot. It gets the old farmhouse nice and toasty nice and quick (no soapstone for me, though I appreciate them). Stand within six feet of the thing when it's raging, and your eyebrows will go up in a puff of ill-smelling smoke...
3. Cool. It's as ugly a thing as the 70's could squeeze out, though this doesn't carry a whole hell of a lot of weight in this decision.
So the last thing I want is to invest in a new stove, only to have it be a pain to start and run, and to have it not be able to heat my house as well or as quickly as the Combifire. The Englander should do it, but I'm just looking for a push over the edge.
Can anyone help me out of being a wuss on this?
Thanks.
Here are my problems with the Combifire:
1. 3-4 hour burn times. My kids are out of diapers and sleep through the night now. I would like to be able to go 8 hours without having to feed the fire; I'm too old for this $*^&
2. Warped door. When it gets hot, gaps show up around the door, allowing too much air in. If a burning log touches the door, it warps enough that the door pops open a little. Not safe or efficient.
3. Efficiency. The damn thing's as old as me. It'd be nice not to burn so much $$$/wood...
Here's what's right about the Combifire:
1. Familiarity. I know how to start a fire in it. I know how to damp it down. There's a comfort level there...
2. Hot. It gets the old farmhouse nice and toasty nice and quick (no soapstone for me, though I appreciate them). Stand within six feet of the thing when it's raging, and your eyebrows will go up in a puff of ill-smelling smoke...
3. Cool. It's as ugly a thing as the 70's could squeeze out, though this doesn't carry a whole hell of a lot of weight in this decision.
So the last thing I want is to invest in a new stove, only to have it be a pain to start and run, and to have it not be able to heat my house as well or as quickly as the Combifire. The Englander should do it, but I'm just looking for a push over the edge.
Can anyone help me out of being a wuss on this?
Thanks.