I've been reading some of the debate on Hearth about BlazeKing 40 vs Regency 5200, but I didn't see the answer to the question running through my head. Backstory, I just bought a house in NW Montana which has a BlazeKing 40 Cat stove installed, manufacture date of June 2007. The side wall air chambers (and in the rear) of the firebox are melted to the point that they are opened with 8"-10" gashes in them. The CAT is not functioning. I have no idea what caused these walls to deteriorate since I have not been maintaining the stove, but clearly, some very hot fires were had.
My question is this. I've noticed that the Regency 5200 uses firebrick on the bottom and sides of it's firebox. The Blazeking only uses them on the bottom. I'm leaning towards the Regency 5200 for this design reason since all other variables seem quite similar. My figuring is that replacing firebrick is a whole cheaper than having air chambers rewelded. Am I off in my reasoning?
Second to that, the Buck Stove Model 91 seems to fall into this same category of large firebox CAT stoves. It's noticeably less expensive. Is the Model 91 of similar quality to the Regency 5200?
My question is this. I've noticed that the Regency 5200 uses firebrick on the bottom and sides of it's firebox. The Blazeking only uses them on the bottom. I'm leaning towards the Regency 5200 for this design reason since all other variables seem quite similar. My figuring is that replacing firebrick is a whole cheaper than having air chambers rewelded. Am I off in my reasoning?
Second to that, the Buck Stove Model 91 seems to fall into this same category of large firebox CAT stoves. It's noticeably less expensive. Is the Model 91 of similar quality to the Regency 5200?