New chimney - most efficient flue connectors for optimal draft?

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
  • Hope everyone has a wonderful and warm Thanksgiving!
  • Super Cedar firestarters 30% discount Use code Hearth2024 Click here
Status
Not open for further replies.

BurningIsLove

New Member
Hearth Supporter
Jan 4, 2006
353
Billerica, MA
Was there any other threads that addressed using 2x45 degree elbows instead of a single 90 degree elbow thank this one?

https://www.hearth.com/talk/threads/890/

I couldnt find one in the search pages. I am just about to install my new Dutchwest 2479 (large non-cat) and since it's also a new chimney (not yet built), I have several options available since the flue connector is reversible (can do top & rear exit, both 6"):

1) top exit flue. Go vertical approx 3', 90 degree elbow, 2' double wall connector into the through-wall connector, 90 degree bend into the flue. Standard install

2) top exit flue. Go vertical approx 2', 45 degree elbow, 2' double-wall connector, 45 degree elbow into through-wall chimney connector, 90 degree turn into the flue

3) rear exit flue. straight shot out the back of the stove to the chimney connector. But the flue connector reversal could be considered a 90 degree turn.

I would think #2 and #3 would be the most efficient for draft and keeping the back wall cooler. Does #2 or #3 draft significantly better/worse than the other? I found both schools of thought on the FAQs. The only other difference I could find was the minimum clearances required. Option #2 requires 16" of clearance to the back wall, #3 requires 13". But I'd rather have a larger clearance and a better draft since Im concerned that this stove really needed an 8" flue connector.

Im leaning towards Option #2 for better draft, Option #3 for child (and drunken adult) safety and less clearance required. Thoughts?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.