We are in the ongoing process of completing a new house. We live in the middle of 50 acres of oak and hickory, so supplies are not a problem. I have been burning stoves for about 30 years (my beloved old Efel, the Hearthstone we used for decades, and lately a Duchwest Large cat that is heating my shop), so I know some of the ins and outs. I do not profess to be an expert, however, particularly with the new secondary burn stoves.
The house is a full basement, 1900 sq. ft of more or less open floorplan on the main level, and another 600 sq. ft. upstairs. The flue is installed and is just about dead center in the main level. I designed the house to be eneregy efficient, so it has fewer windows that are the norm today, six inch fiberlass-filled walls, with another one inch of foam on the outside, and about r-60 in the attic. Our climate is lower mid-west - not far north of Springfield, Missouri. The design seems to be working - my Jan. electric bill (we are all electric) was only $130, even after the coldest Jan. in many years.
Ok, I know the payback on a stove is terrible for me. I might save $70 or $80 a month, six months a year. But that's not the point, is it? I like wood burning stoves. I want to be warm even when the power goes down. I like splitting wood with an ax. You all will understand, I am sure.
I keep looking, but I keep coming back to Jotul - either the 500 or the 600. I intend to burn 24/7 for at least four months a year, so soapstone seemed feasible as well. We like the Hearthstone Heritage, and certainly had no complaints about the longevity of the old one (it stayed with the house, and is still there, I assume), but the new ones no longer have a true ashpan! Just a sort of built-in scoop! In fact, I see by these forums that most people shovel out the ashes from the firebox. Man, I just cannot see it. The mess, the necessity to let the coals burn down, the mess, the inconvenience, the mess... am I missing something here? Then I looked at the Woodstock Fireview - people seem to just love them. But again - no ashpan at all! And 16" maximum log length - the one thing I didn't like about the old Efel way back when. If there is something important that I need to know, I'm listening.
Several others were non-starters - PE for its front-only loading (my hearth configuration really needs a side door. On the left, if possible, but a side door for sure). Welded steel stoves just don't do it for me.
So I keep coming back to the Jotul. The looks are ok. Takes nice long logs. No cat, which I THINK I would prefer. Good size ash pan which I can carry out back and dump. People seem to be generally happy with them. We have a dealer reasonably close. But if there is a fallacy in my thinking, please set me straight.
Thanks, Mark
The house is a full basement, 1900 sq. ft of more or less open floorplan on the main level, and another 600 sq. ft. upstairs. The flue is installed and is just about dead center in the main level. I designed the house to be eneregy efficient, so it has fewer windows that are the norm today, six inch fiberlass-filled walls, with another one inch of foam on the outside, and about r-60 in the attic. Our climate is lower mid-west - not far north of Springfield, Missouri. The design seems to be working - my Jan. electric bill (we are all electric) was only $130, even after the coldest Jan. in many years.
Ok, I know the payback on a stove is terrible for me. I might save $70 or $80 a month, six months a year. But that's not the point, is it? I like wood burning stoves. I want to be warm even when the power goes down. I like splitting wood with an ax. You all will understand, I am sure.
I keep looking, but I keep coming back to Jotul - either the 500 or the 600. I intend to burn 24/7 for at least four months a year, so soapstone seemed feasible as well. We like the Hearthstone Heritage, and certainly had no complaints about the longevity of the old one (it stayed with the house, and is still there, I assume), but the new ones no longer have a true ashpan! Just a sort of built-in scoop! In fact, I see by these forums that most people shovel out the ashes from the firebox. Man, I just cannot see it. The mess, the necessity to let the coals burn down, the mess, the inconvenience, the mess... am I missing something here? Then I looked at the Woodstock Fireview - people seem to just love them. But again - no ashpan at all! And 16" maximum log length - the one thing I didn't like about the old Efel way back when. If there is something important that I need to know, I'm listening.
Several others were non-starters - PE for its front-only loading (my hearth configuration really needs a side door. On the left, if possible, but a side door for sure). Welded steel stoves just don't do it for me.
So I keep coming back to the Jotul. The looks are ok. Takes nice long logs. No cat, which I THINK I would prefer. Good size ash pan which I can carry out back and dump. People seem to be generally happy with them. We have a dealer reasonably close. But if there is a fallacy in my thinking, please set me straight.
Thanks, Mark