Eric Johnson said:A lack of information and a blatant attempt to baffle you with BS.
The CB has a "Custom-Designed Synergetic Combustion System"
The Heatmor features a "Three-Stage Combustion Process" that includes a "Fusion Combustor" and a "Reaction Chamber."
Whatever all that means. They give zero details. I don't know why they don't have cut-out diagrams like everyone else so you can see what all the excitement is about.
Anyway, they both claim to pass the EPA regs, so that's good. I'd like to see both in action.
Redox said:WOW! Central Boiler is claiming near 100% combustion efficiency.
I also noticed a link to their rebuttal page at
www.outdoorfurnacefacts.com
I have issues with some of their answers on the "Facts and Myths" page.
heaterman said:It's hilarious really.
All these companies are coming out like they've reinvented fire itself.
It's not rocket science guys. Good wood+good basic gasification technology+ storage = a nice clean efficient burn. Simple as that.
Synergistic combustion......... my butt
Fusion chamber........get real people!
You're just burning wood gases not plutonium for cryin' out loud!!
I have to wonder about the logic of what I've heard as far as water content on some of the brands mentioned.........as low as 7-8 gallons???
What's up with that? We all know that (A) cycling a solid wood fire is difficult to say the least and (B) large water volume makes for a nicer cleaner burn. Sounds to me like some of these manufacturers have found a loophole they can crawl through in the EPA testing criteria. I'd dare bet that these units are tested under steady state burn conditions just like the meaningless AFUE rating on gas and oil fired appliances. How often does that happen in a real world scenario without storage? Now do it in a boiler with 7 gallons of water content. Let's just say it'll be interesting.
Central and Heatmor will probably make it because they have enough cash to deluge the market with hype and advertising. Lot's of the smaller guys are going to bite the dust.
leaddog said:I think they are trying to keep things as secret as possible to try and stay ahead of the competition. leaddog
Garnification said:heaterman said:It's hilarious really.
All these companies are coming out like they've reinvented fire itself.
It's not rocket science guys. Good wood+good basic gasification technology+ storage = a nice clean efficient burn. Simple as that.
Synergistic combustion......... my butt
Fusion chamber........get real people!
You're just burning wood gases not plutonium for cryin' out loud!!
I have to wonder about the logic of what I've heard as far as water content on some of the brands mentioned.........as low as 7-8 gallons???
What's up with that? We all know that (A) cycling a solid wood fire is difficult to say the least and (B) large water volume makes for a nicer cleaner burn. Sounds to me like some of these manufacturers have found a loophole they can crawl through in the EPA testing criteria. I'd dare bet that these units are tested under steady state burn conditions just like the meaningless AFUE rating on gas and oil fired appliances. How often does that happen in a real world scenario without storage? Now do it in a boiler with 7 gallons of water content. Let's just say it'll be interesting.
Central and Heatmor will probably make it because they have enough cash to deluge the market with hype and advertising. Lot's of the smaller guys are going to bite the dust.
Heaterman, The mass refractory units like Greenwood, Greenfire, Adobe etc.. only have @6-8 gal. but I heard that they don't pass the .6lbs emission test. Have you heard any of this?
magnumhntr said:Seeing as we're talking about the OWGB coming out, I am curious as to why I would choose an EKO or Tarm, or other indoor gasification boiler over a OWGB? Price looks to be about the same once you factor in storage, and it would keep the mess outdoors. I see that Cozy Heat doesn't have anyhthing good to say about them, but they are a EKO ans Tarm dealer, so I'm sure they want to keep selling those. So what are the downfalls to the new OWGB's?
Thanks!
Chris
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.