New York State solar farm corruption

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm not sure an antireflection coating would work to solve the problem.
Going from 4% of sunlight reflected (glass) to 1% of sunlight (typically antireflection coatings cut reflections to 1/4) reflected and hitting one's eyes is still problematic.
 
There's so much space that would be good for solar panels, seems to me just not putting them too close to airports is the easiest solution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stoveliker
I found this:

4. Special Environments (Aviation & Transit)
Because of the elevation and proximity concerns, major glare issues are heavily scrutinized by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) near airports. Solar developers are required to use specific modeling software like ForgeSolar to calculate exact reflection zones and ensure that panels do not blind pilots or air traffic controllers. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
If you are dealing with a specific glare issue in your area, or want to know the exact reflection path for a nearby installation:
 
There's so much space that would be good for solar panels, seems to me just not putting them too close to airports is the easiest solution.
Agreed but that takes coordination. They allowed new cell towers that interfered with instrumental approaches.
 
Another solar farm success story where sheep, special pigs, chickens, and bees co-inhabit with mutual benefits.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kborndale
  • Like
Reactions: semipro
Cats and dogs living together is next!
 
That's bad indeed. Apparently farmers are not the only ones violating run-off control rules. Good that they got a fine.
 
Things are about to get very interesting in NY! Brooke Rollins, Lee Zeldin, John RIch are all involved now. Queen Hochul has some questions they want answered
 
Things are about to get very interesting in NY! Brooke Rollins, Lee Zeldin, John RIch are all involved now. Queen Hochul has some questions they want answered
I dont understand how the governor could be expected to monitor compliance of every project
 
I dont understand how the governor could be expected to monitor compliance of every project
You can find the questions she is being asked in the document in the link below.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
The farmland is hardly disappearing. In 20-30 years... its still there!

We waste so much food production as it is, and honestly climate change is a bigger threat to Ag than letting the land lie fallow for a couple decades.
 
The farmland is hardly disappearing. In 20-30 years... its still there!

We waste so much food production as it is, and honestly climate change is a bigger threat to Ag in the US than letting the land lie fallow for a couple decades.
I fixed it for you.
Because Canada may like the growth regions moving up North ... (if they can keep the fires down...)
 
The cries of farmland loss are greatly exaggerated. A smart farmer can double his or her income. It doesn't have to be an either or situation. Just elevate the panels. Solar is cow approved.
 
The cries of farmland loss are greatly exaggerated. A smart farmer can double his or her income. It doesn't have to be an either or situation. Just elevate the panels. Solar is cow approved.
This is just the beginning. When does it end? Will you ever say, down the road, that it is no longer exaggerated?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: bholler
Economics will provide a clear endpoint: once enough power is made without spewing crap in the air that you don't want in your lungs, and without adding to gases that warm and destabilize our shared atmosphere, new solar farms are not viable any longer. Or (unrealistic fatalistic view) once so much farm land has been converted into solar farms that food prices will rise (never, ever going to reach that point), economics won't support more solar farms (even with subsidies, if any).

Note that that amount of solar farms needed to replace all fossil power plants would equal one half of one percent of the total area of the continental US. So not consequential in the big picture. (Adding wind, adding rooftop, possibly wave based, it'll even be less than 0.5% - of course grid scale storage would need space too, but that's far, far less.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: sloeffle
Economics will provide a clear endpoint: once enough power is made without spewing crap in the air that you don't want in your lungs, and without adding to gases that warm and destabilize our shared atmosphere, new solar farms are not viable any longer. Or (unrealistic fatalistic view) once so much farm land has been converted into solar farms that food prices will rise (never, ever going to reach that point), economics won't support more solar farms (even with subsidies, if any).

Note that that amount of solar farms needed to replace all fossil power plants would equal one half of one percent of the total area of the continental US. So not consequential in the big picture. (Adding wind, adding rooftop, possibly wave based, it'll even be less than 0.5% - of course grid scale storage would need space too, but that's far, far less.)
I don't buy those figures.
 
Duds, how do you feel about growing corn for ethanol to put in engines?

[Hearth.com] New York State solar farm corruption


One acre of solar panels in a year will propel EVs for 830,000 miles.
One acre of corn in a year will make enough ethanol to propel a car 11,200 miles.

We currently grow corn on 30 million acres of land, solely to produce ethanol for this purpose. And studies show that the fossil fuels required to produce the corn are nearly equal to the amount of gasoline displaced. :rolleyes:

In the US, 30 million acres are being intensively used (and gradually depleted and eroded) for this nonsensical purpose.

We could take half a million of those acres, put them under PV (no depletion or erosion of the land underneath), get the same miles of propulsion we currently get (ignoring fossil inputs to the ethanol), and voila... 29.5 millions acres of NEW cropland are available!

Its this huge difference in the value of the crop ( $$ electricity > $$ food calories) that allows farmers to put a small area under panels and increase their income significantly.
 
Seems like there is a preference for disinformation provided by the fossil fuel industry instead, got it. Closing thread, it's going nowhere.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.