I have a 40yr old Big Buck 28000 insert, with a firebox that - if I've measured correctly at 28W*24H*17D" is >6cu.ft.
I want to upgrade to a new low-polluting, high-efficiency insert
I don't want an overnight load (coastal California mountains), but I do have a big living-dining area (28ft*37ft with ceilings 10-16ft).
If my efficiency is going to double (maybe?) with new technology does this mean I can use a much smaller fire-box?
Candidate models Lopi Evergreen, Osburn Inspire 2000 and Montlake 230 have fireboxes 2.2 to 2.4 cu.ft.
Or Osburn 3500 and Montlake 300 are 3.0 to 3.5 cu.ft.
Does it matter for efficiency whether I cram a small firebox full? or use a small load in a bigger firebox?
Thre's an attraction to being able to load 22" logs into a Osburn 3500 instead of only 18" into a Montlake 230 ...
All advice welcome to thi newbie at the forum!
I want to upgrade to a new low-polluting, high-efficiency insert
I don't want an overnight load (coastal California mountains), but I do have a big living-dining area (28ft*37ft with ceilings 10-16ft).
If my efficiency is going to double (maybe?) with new technology does this mean I can use a much smaller fire-box?
Candidate models Lopi Evergreen, Osburn Inspire 2000 and Montlake 230 have fireboxes 2.2 to 2.4 cu.ft.
Or Osburn 3500 and Montlake 300 are 3.0 to 3.5 cu.ft.
Does it matter for efficiency whether I cram a small firebox full? or use a small load in a bigger firebox?
Thre's an attraction to being able to load 22" logs into a Osburn 3500 instead of only 18" into a Montlake 230 ...
All advice welcome to thi newbie at the forum!