Old Timer's Technique

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
  • Hope everyone has a wonderful and warm Thanksgiving!
  • Super Cedar firestarters 30% discount Use code Hearth2024 Click here
Status
Not open for further replies.

johnpma

Feeling the Heat
Jan 29, 2014
365
W. Mass
I was at a town meeting and ran into a "townie" who has burned wood for over 50 years. He says "son I see you out there working on your stacks" Explained to him how we cut and split our wood last fall and now I'm in the process of moving my wood and stacking it for the winter.

He explained "here is what I do" : Drop the trees in the early spring once the leaves show, and leave the trees un-limbed as is laying for the spring/summer He then goes back in October cuts his lengths, splits, stacks, and burns that winter. He claims leaving the limbs on the down trees keeps the leaves alive and this will draw the moisture from the wood allowing it to burn just fine that winter.

Anyone ever done their wood this way or tried this technique?
 
Sounds interesting, guess this is his perception? Presume there isn't an actual monitoring device such as a moisture meter?
 
There have been many tests of this contention and I have heard it before from old timers but there is no substitute for cutting and splitting ASAP. Old timers tend to have older homes with higher heating loads and older stoves. Odds are he is running the stove hard where creosote doesn't form.

I usually drop trees in late winter if possible as the moisture content is about the lowest. I find cleaning up the slash without leaves on it is way less work.
 
I suspect that a) the guy has an older pre-EPA stove, b) the guy learned this technique from his father/fgrandfather, etc. and c) he has to deal with creosote every year (or is a chimney fire in waiting.)

While I am sure a tree cut this way -- heck any tree just cut down -- will lose some of its moisture, there really is no better alternative than cutting, splitting and stacking to get the maximum drying out of your fuel (other than kilns). Think of it this way . . . what would dry faster a wet bathing suit left crumpled up on the ground or a bathing suit hanging on a clothesline (where there is more surface area exposed to wind)? Both will dry eventually . . . but one method will dry much faster and better.
 
This doesnt work with birch, at all.

With other types they might get to fsp, about 30% mc in one summer, but i doubt much below that.
 
All of this made me wonder about this year with ground water so low. Streams rivers and brooks so low is it possible that the trees would too have less moisture this year because of the mild winter and lack of rain?
 
Some of these old guys also intentionally start a chimney fire every so often to "clean it out".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ashful
My mom grew up in a farm in Quebec, they heated with wood and pretty well expected a chimney fire every so often. Most farmhouses had unlined chimneys and tin roofs so the sparks usually wouldn't set the house on fire.
 
Ask him about pine. I bet you'll get a lecture. 50 years of experience does not mean he does something well or bases on actual information.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CentralVAWoodHeat
I'd like to say cut/split/stacked will dry faster. It's what I do and see.

However, it's interesting to consider how much water a tree goes through in a year. For example, USGS says a large oak tree soaks up and transpires 40,000 gallons of water per year. That's 160 tons of water per year for a single large oak tree. Frankly I find that suspicious for a tree that might weigh 16 tons. But if true, that means the oak tree, while alive, can transport 10 times its weight of water through the trunk in a year, yet when the trunk is dead and cut into 16" lengths can't get rid of half of its water weight in a year. So, maybe an alive tree is better at transporting water out through the leaves.

But something doesn't add up for me. I'd still c/s/s.
 
I say cut it, split and stack it as soon as you can. And then wait two to three years to burn it. And unless he is on a walker I bet I am an older timer than he is. All of these old fools tales are exactly that.

Used to do that kind of stuff myself until I found this place 11 years ago and got dry wood religion. I had a big red oak whacked and on the ground six years ago. When I got around to slicing it water poured out of it for two days. Poured. After a year on the ground.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oldman47
Status
Not open for further replies.