I recently purchased a Pacific Energy Super insert and picked it up the other day. I specifically purchased PE due to its outside air capability. I have two Napoleon stoves at our cabin that have outside air and I like the way it works. Also, the house the PE is going into has a very large professional-style range hood nearby that I would worry about causing negative pressure.
The PE manual, which I downloaded and reviewed prior to purchase, states that the ash dump should be used to supply outside air and the surround should be sealed to the front of the fireplace. I called PE to see if the surround should be sealed with insulation or with high-temp silicone. PE stated it should be silicone to ensure it is absolutely air tight and air is not pulled from inside the house. So, it seems they intend for the stove to truly use outside air from the literature and phone conversation, and be airtight otherwise.
I now have the stove in my possession and looked at the back where it takes in outside air. Right next to the OA inlet are huge openings in the outside shell. It appears the double-walled area in which the blower circulates the air around the sides and back of stove is not in any way sealed or even close to air tight. It has just as much access to the outside air as the air inlet for the stove. Why is sealing the surround so tightly such a concern if the stove can just pull air from inside the house through the blower housing? Won't this let cold air come into the house when the stove is off and mix cold outside air with the heated blower air when its on?
It looks like the small seams in the shell could be sealed with flu tape, but the opening in the back is so ill fitting, that it looks like the shell would have to be completely and precisely refabricated to have any chance of making the stove remotely airtight from the outside. Am I missing something? I'll try call PE Monday, but so far I feel a bit ripped off and think their literature was misleading. Thanks. (see photo link below)
(broken link removed to https://picasaweb.google.com/102856565833202429094/PacificEnergy?authuser=0&authkey=Gv1sRgCPzWk6y8v4qNcg&feat=directlink)
The PE manual, which I downloaded and reviewed prior to purchase, states that the ash dump should be used to supply outside air and the surround should be sealed to the front of the fireplace. I called PE to see if the surround should be sealed with insulation or with high-temp silicone. PE stated it should be silicone to ensure it is absolutely air tight and air is not pulled from inside the house. So, it seems they intend for the stove to truly use outside air from the literature and phone conversation, and be airtight otherwise.
I now have the stove in my possession and looked at the back where it takes in outside air. Right next to the OA inlet are huge openings in the outside shell. It appears the double-walled area in which the blower circulates the air around the sides and back of stove is not in any way sealed or even close to air tight. It has just as much access to the outside air as the air inlet for the stove. Why is sealing the surround so tightly such a concern if the stove can just pull air from inside the house through the blower housing? Won't this let cold air come into the house when the stove is off and mix cold outside air with the heated blower air when its on?
It looks like the small seams in the shell could be sealed with flu tape, but the opening in the back is so ill fitting, that it looks like the shell would have to be completely and precisely refabricated to have any chance of making the stove remotely airtight from the outside. Am I missing something? I'll try call PE Monday, but so far I feel a bit ripped off and think their literature was misleading. Thanks. (see photo link below)
(broken link removed to https://picasaweb.google.com/102856565833202429094/PacificEnergy?authuser=0&authkey=Gv1sRgCPzWk6y8v4qNcg&feat=directlink)