Apologize in advance as this post might be a little long and boring. I figured I might throw in the whole story, rather than asking questions here and there; the bigger picture is always better after all.
I’m currently looking to change my whole heating system (from electrical space heaters with an awkwardly placed free standing wood stove) to either a hydronic furnace powered by a gasifier (which means I would need to retrofit ductwork in the house), or radiant flooring for the first floor with hydronic radiators in the basement and second floor. I’m in the process of making a detailed heat load calculation of my 1,600 square feet 2-story home. This portion of the design has yet to be discussed with the local installer as to what would be less costly and more appropriate for my house.
Although I have not separated the electricity consumed for things other than heating, I have the data for a -25 day (which is still -7 degrees short from design temperature), it appears that I used up 215.7822 kWh, or roughly 350,000 BTU on a 24 hour period.
Regarding the gasifier, the only local dealer in my community carries Portage & Main boilers. Although I am not too fond about an outdoor wood boiler, I am considering making a 20*10 heated outbuilding with the Economizer IDM 100 (there only indoors gasifier, with a maximum rated output ranging from 90,000 BTU to 140,000 BTU – depending on what web site you are looking at) with enough space to install 2-3 thermal tanks of 400 gallons each (questions regarding this approach follows).
My first issue: according to P&M’s FAQs :
“Our gasifiers and boilers are specifically designed not to require additional water. Therefore, there is no need to have an additional storage tank. With the exception of commercial applications such as greenhouses where most of the heat is required at night, having a large storage tank of 2000 to 10000 gallons is not necessary.”
From what I have read on here, -ANY- gasification boiler can benefit from additional storage as it creates a known demand, reduces idle time, burns cleaner, etc. I have sent an email to P&M regarding this issue, but I have not received an official answer as of yet. Does anyone know why they would advertise such claims? Does there design really have no benefit of adding additional thermal storage for residential applications?
My second issue is in regards to the question that has been dealt a thousand times, but I am still not sure I understand fully… low temperature return / corrosion issues. From an old post made by heaterman :
If I understand this post correctly, the added thermal storage will reduce if not eliminate the idling time, meaning that one could do burning-batches and let the fire die out without being reignited for prolonged periods (for as long as the heated storage suffices). As long as there is no flue gas in the exhaust, there is no risk of condensation… I’m I correct? The problem with condensation occurs when the fire is idling too low that the gas can’t/isn’t heated enough, correct? Theoretically that would mean that the fire could be out for days and living with the storage without risking condensation?
My third and last question revolves around the pressurized and non pressurized storages. I understand the pros and cons of both, but can someone install a pressurized system on a non pressurized boiler? If I read and understood correctly, it is doable, with a heat/plate exchanger, but it is not the most efficient option as there is some BTUs lost in the transfer plates occurring?
If you are still reading this, I am amazed! Thanks!
I’m currently looking to change my whole heating system (from electrical space heaters with an awkwardly placed free standing wood stove) to either a hydronic furnace powered by a gasifier (which means I would need to retrofit ductwork in the house), or radiant flooring for the first floor with hydronic radiators in the basement and second floor. I’m in the process of making a detailed heat load calculation of my 1,600 square feet 2-story home. This portion of the design has yet to be discussed with the local installer as to what would be less costly and more appropriate for my house.
Although I have not separated the electricity consumed for things other than heating, I have the data for a -25 day (which is still -7 degrees short from design temperature), it appears that I used up 215.7822 kWh, or roughly 350,000 BTU on a 24 hour period.
Regarding the gasifier, the only local dealer in my community carries Portage & Main boilers. Although I am not too fond about an outdoor wood boiler, I am considering making a 20*10 heated outbuilding with the Economizer IDM 100 (there only indoors gasifier, with a maximum rated output ranging from 90,000 BTU to 140,000 BTU – depending on what web site you are looking at) with enough space to install 2-3 thermal tanks of 400 gallons each (questions regarding this approach follows).
My first issue: according to P&M’s FAQs :
“Our gasifiers and boilers are specifically designed not to require additional water. Therefore, there is no need to have an additional storage tank. With the exception of commercial applications such as greenhouses where most of the heat is required at night, having a large storage tank of 2000 to 10000 gallons is not necessary.”
From what I have read on here, -ANY- gasification boiler can benefit from additional storage as it creates a known demand, reduces idle time, burns cleaner, etc. I have sent an email to P&M regarding this issue, but I have not received an official answer as of yet. Does anyone know why they would advertise such claims? Does there design really have no benefit of adding additional thermal storage for residential applications?
My second issue is in regards to the question that has been dealt a thousand times, but I am still not sure I understand fully… low temperature return / corrosion issues. From an old post made by heaterman :
The issue with your boiler or any boiler for that matter, is flue gas condensation. It simply has to be prevented in any boiler that is not designed to withstand liquid instead of vapor in the heat exchanger and flues. Doesn't matter if you're firing with wood, coal, oil or gas, Flue gas condensation will without fail eventually wreck your boiler.
So ...the simple solution to preventing said condensation from happening is to keep the flue gas temperature above the dew point or otherwise said, the point at which vapor in the flue gas turns back into liquid. In most scenarios (there are a few variables) you will find that in order to maintain sufficient flue gas temp the water temperature must be kept above 140* for solid fuel appliances. (Moisture content of the fuel is a significant factor in this also)
This is done in a couple of different ways. One being the use of a termovar diverting valve that routes hot water back to the boiler before it hits the system. The other is the installation of an aquastat the turns off the boiler circ should water temp drop below the setpoint and allow the boiler to "catch up".
I had my combustion analyzer in a couple of flues this past week looking at the dew point among other things. The first piece of equipment was a standard downdraft gasser the owner was having issues with from creosote plugging things up. While the design of the boiler is less than stellar and contributed to some of his problem, his main issue was wet wood and a lot of idling. Moisture content of the wood (oak seasoned last summer and this) was still over 28% in many splits. The dew point of the exhaust gas was just under 150* which is very high. This means he has to keep his water temp somewhat above that or the flue gas will be too cool and it will rain in the chimney. This is a very bad thing.In his situation the boiler was connected to a huge load (several thousand sq ft of concrete slab) that dropped the water temp below
the critical point. Lot's of black goo everywhere. He will be installing a pump aquastat to kill the main circ when water temp drops below 160*.
The other boiler was pellet fired and due to the design of the boiler and the extremely dry nature of pellets the dew point of the flue gas was running only 116* to 118* degrees. This boiler has an integral pump aquastat that can be adjusted to different set points. We set it to tuen off the circ at 140* to give him a margin for error/variability.
If I understand this post correctly, the added thermal storage will reduce if not eliminate the idling time, meaning that one could do burning-batches and let the fire die out without being reignited for prolonged periods (for as long as the heated storage suffices). As long as there is no flue gas in the exhaust, there is no risk of condensation… I’m I correct? The problem with condensation occurs when the fire is idling too low that the gas can’t/isn’t heated enough, correct? Theoretically that would mean that the fire could be out for days and living with the storage without risking condensation?
My third and last question revolves around the pressurized and non pressurized storages. I understand the pros and cons of both, but can someone install a pressurized system on a non pressurized boiler? If I read and understood correctly, it is doable, with a heat/plate exchanger, but it is not the most efficient option as there is some BTUs lost in the transfer plates occurring?
If you are still reading this, I am amazed! Thanks!