Or another title could be, "What were the engineers thinking of?!"
The safety snap switch trips when the stove overheats, and shuts power completely off to the stove, which in my Not So Humble Opinion, is DUMB!
On almost any, if not all, modern heating appliance, an overheat condition shuts off the FUEL supply, ONLY. It leaves the indoor blower/convection fan and draft inducer an to run, pulling and and all heat out of the system, as quickly as possible. This is a safety concern.
I wonder why, PP shuts the entire stove down, leaving a fire pot, with fuel burning and still generating heat, and the convection blower shuts down, adding to a heat soak situation.
Any ideas as to why, or reasons to not make the wiring change, so only the feed motor shuts down, in an overheat condition?
The safety snap switch trips when the stove overheats, and shuts power completely off to the stove, which in my Not So Humble Opinion, is DUMB!
On almost any, if not all, modern heating appliance, an overheat condition shuts off the FUEL supply, ONLY. It leaves the indoor blower/convection fan and draft inducer an to run, pulling and and all heat out of the system, as quickly as possible. This is a safety concern.
I wonder why, PP shuts the entire stove down, leaving a fire pot, with fuel burning and still generating heat, and the convection blower shuts down, adding to a heat soak situation.
Any ideas as to why, or reasons to not make the wiring change, so only the feed motor shuts down, in an overheat condition?