I'm in the process of upgrading my current hybrid flexible no insulation liner system. With my terracotta tiles being 7.25" X 11" I'm in a tight spot. I also want the liner to be insulated and removable if need be. This limits my options to an ovalized flexible with 1/2" wrap. After calling Woodland they offer the Heavy Duty flexible that starts as a 7" round and ovalizes into 5.5" X 9". If I put 1/2" wrap around it I should have some room to put down the chimney. They also might have a rectangular liner that could fit to. Either option brings me to my question for you.
The area of a 6" pipe is 28.25 square inches. This is the optimal size that Woodstock says the PH should run on. The ovalized pipe calcs out to be 31.8. The rectangular liners I think are even more. Does anyone have experience running the PH with a larger liner than the reccomend 6"? I imagine someone somewhere has put this into an 8" flue?
Besides less draft is there any issue that could arise? I think the 1/2" insulation on the new liner would more than offset the normal 6" liner that is currently being run without insulation. Then again I've never burned with an insulated liner before.
Thoughts?
The area of a 6" pipe is 28.25 square inches. This is the optimal size that Woodstock says the PH should run on. The ovalized pipe calcs out to be 31.8. The rectangular liners I think are even more. Does anyone have experience running the PH with a larger liner than the reccomend 6"? I imagine someone somewhere has put this into an 8" flue?
Besides less draft is there any issue that could arise? I think the 1/2" insulation on the new liner would more than offset the normal 6" liner that is currently being run without insulation. Then again I've never burned with an insulated liner before.
Thoughts?