So not a test, but a semi-permanent install. My apologies to bholler then, it's a bit crazier plan than I thought. This is not a stove, it's an insert and meant to be installed in a fireplace. I can't see this plan passing inspection or insurance approval. The double-90 turn in the smoke path right out of the insert is not going to help matters.
Here is the passage from manual for the current incarnation of this insert.
Here is the passage from manual for the current incarnation of this insert.
- THE INSERT AND ITS STAINLESS STEEL CHIMNEY LINER ARE TO BE INSTALLED ONLY WITHIN A LINED MASONRY CHIMNEY AND MASONRY FIREPLACE CONFORMING TO BUILDING CODES FOR USE WITH SOLID FUEL.
Last edited:
It may be a very short lived test if the chimney draft is a problem. You see I've added a 45 and 9" of horizontal pipe to the original configuration which consisted of a single 45. What affect that will have on the draft I won't know until I burn some paper in it. So the test may end there. If it does end there I"ll re-install the insert. I'll leave the new hearth pad in place. The original step hearth was rather small and awkward so I'm happy to be rid of that. The nice big flat hearth pad will be much easier to work around. I'll also be adding a little roxul around the fireplace before I put the insert back in. Maybe that will help the stove radiate a little more heat. Other's have done that and claim it worked well for them.
![[Hearth.com] Rear flue exit VS Top flue exit [Hearth.com] Rear flue exit VS Top flue exit](https://www.hearth.com/talk/data/attachments/142/142556-21f78da1c7f780ba671741cae4d3af7e.jpg?hash=3JwqOTrYey)