Running a pellet boiler at a lower output level is supposed to be good. They say there is less wear and tear from startup and better economy. Thing is, it probably won't have the oomph for those cold days, or if a deep setback is chosen.
I have a couple Ecobee SmartSi thermostats that have staging capability for 2 heat stages (cooling too-but I have no A/C). It turns on the second stage when the first stage can't keep up with keeping the area warm. My thought is to assign the first stage to the zone pumps and the second stage to the oil boiler (they are attached in parallel).
I don't have that much understanding of hvac equipment control, so I measured what happens on the first stage and second stages terminals. It does appear that the first stage remains energized after the second stage comes on. So, stage 1, the zone pumps would run and if they can't satisfy the requirement within a certain amount of time (2 hours max) and at a minimum temp delta (10 deg max) before stage 2, the boiler, is turned on. Or reverse staging could be used which starts stage 1 (the zone pumps) and when the minimum temp delta is exceeded (again 10 deg max), stage 2, the boiler, would fire up and stay fired up until the room temp is again within the stage 2 temp delta, at which time stage 2 turns off and stage 1 brings it to setpoint.
I'm not sure if reverse staging would be best for my setup. As a boost from a deep setback, I can see it, because heat loss through the house envelope would be exceeded by the capacity of the pellet boiler. If it's real cold out I wonder if this would lead to excessive cycling of the oil boiler, with the pellet boiler running flat out as well.
Of course, I could arrange it so that any time it is started up, the oil boiler would run until its aquastat is satisfied and it, along with the pellet boiler, charges up the buffer tank. This would assure no short cycling for the oil boiler. The oil boiler's aquastat would have to be lowered so that the pellet boiler doesn't shut down by its own built-in aquastat.
Another control plan offered by the thermostat is to run stage 1 for up to two hours and if the temp requirement isn't satisfied to some minimum delta, as above, stage 2 would start and would run until the setpoint is reached.
Ecobee's online app would allow analysis of stage 2 run times for tuning.
This is also a solution for unattended switchover to oil if the pellet store is emptied or the pellet boiler is inoperative.
It also has the advantage of eliminating some of the controls initially installed.
I'll update this thread when/if I get something working.
Ecobee thermostat manual: https://ecobee.zendesk.com/attachme...?name=EB-SmartSiIM-01-rev1_april3_general.pdf
I have a couple Ecobee SmartSi thermostats that have staging capability for 2 heat stages (cooling too-but I have no A/C). It turns on the second stage when the first stage can't keep up with keeping the area warm. My thought is to assign the first stage to the zone pumps and the second stage to the oil boiler (they are attached in parallel).
I don't have that much understanding of hvac equipment control, so I measured what happens on the first stage and second stages terminals. It does appear that the first stage remains energized after the second stage comes on. So, stage 1, the zone pumps would run and if they can't satisfy the requirement within a certain amount of time (2 hours max) and at a minimum temp delta (10 deg max) before stage 2, the boiler, is turned on. Or reverse staging could be used which starts stage 1 (the zone pumps) and when the minimum temp delta is exceeded (again 10 deg max), stage 2, the boiler, would fire up and stay fired up until the room temp is again within the stage 2 temp delta, at which time stage 2 turns off and stage 1 brings it to setpoint.
I'm not sure if reverse staging would be best for my setup. As a boost from a deep setback, I can see it, because heat loss through the house envelope would be exceeded by the capacity of the pellet boiler. If it's real cold out I wonder if this would lead to excessive cycling of the oil boiler, with the pellet boiler running flat out as well.
Of course, I could arrange it so that any time it is started up, the oil boiler would run until its aquastat is satisfied and it, along with the pellet boiler, charges up the buffer tank. This would assure no short cycling for the oil boiler. The oil boiler's aquastat would have to be lowered so that the pellet boiler doesn't shut down by its own built-in aquastat.
Another control plan offered by the thermostat is to run stage 1 for up to two hours and if the temp requirement isn't satisfied to some minimum delta, as above, stage 2 would start and would run until the setpoint is reached.
Ecobee's online app would allow analysis of stage 2 run times for tuning.
This is also a solution for unattended switchover to oil if the pellet store is emptied or the pellet boiler is inoperative.
It also has the advantage of eliminating some of the controls initially installed.
I'll update this thread when/if I get something working.
Ecobee thermostat manual: https://ecobee.zendesk.com/attachme...?name=EB-SmartSiIM-01-rev1_april3_general.pdf