A few years back, I stopped by a local wood dealer who had a firewood processing yard and building where after splitting, he would stack it inside where he had a 2 wood stoves going and lots of fans. (It was in the middle of winter) He told me it took about 2 weeks to "season" the wood. He had mostly fir, maple and alder. Like most of you I had serious doubts and thus the reason for my post title But, with this in mind and having read so many posts on best ways to season wood, store wood, stack wood, wood drying or not drying in winter, how long it takes, temperature, humidity, wind etc. I decided to do some testing and hope others will as well and report back. My thought was to split a round and mark the ends on some pieces from the same round and weigh them on a kitchen scale. Put them in the stack and weigh them regularly to see how much moister they are losing. It's simple as long as my wife doesn't catch me with her scale in the wood shed.
From previous work measuring water content in mountain snow packs, I knew that a windy day could remove way more water from the snow pack than a warmer but calm day. From that and everything else I've seen, I figured air movement was the most critical aspect in speeding the drying process so I aimed a small fan (34 watts on high) toward my stack with some pieces labeled. Besides I didn't have any way to add heat. I weighed each piece on a kitchen scale before and daily afterwards and put all the data into a spread sheet. Email if you want a copy as it's not an allowed file type.
I put a seasoned piece of fir next to a wet, fresh split piece of fir from a tree that blew over last month. I have two other pieces of fir from that same round (one thin and one big) that are 8' away and not in the path of the fan. I started with just the seasoned piece of fir on Jan 7 and then added the wet pieces of fir on the 13th and later some wet alder on the 20th, one in the fan and one away.
An abbreviated version of the data is below, hopefully you can read it. These are my conclusions so far.
In front of the fan, the wet fir lost over 21% moisture by weight in less than 10 days and the Alder 37% in 5 and over 40% in 10! Talk about accelerating the drying process in the middle of winter
The fan causes the wood to lose moisture almost twice as fast as without the fan in the beginning week or so. More so in the Alder than the fir. I'm guessing this is due to a combination of the higher water content, difference in wood cell properties and since the alder rounds were big enough, the two splits are from inside the bark where as the fir pieces still have their bark on. The fir pieces are also longer.
As expected the wood dries fastest at first and decreases over time allowing the pieces away from the fan to begin to begin to catch up with those in front of the fan, But I am sure the pieces out of the direct path of the fan are still benefitting from the air moving around them as I can feel air movement at their location. I'm sure if I put them under a tarp, drying would slow way down which I think is pretty important for all of us tarp users.
The wood loses more moisture after a dry day verses a rainy humid one. No surprise as relative humidity drives the gradient for moisture loss.
It was nice to see that my "seasoned" fir lost only about 1.8% in over 3 weeks in front of the fan and to see that it gained moisture on the more humid days.
The smaller (thinner) piece of fir definitely dried faster than the fatter split.
I'm sure species like oak would be lots slower but easy to test with this method.
If I have done my math right, (no guarantee, but hopefully in the ball park), it takes ~2500 btus to heat and evaporate 1 kg (2.2 lbs) of water from 60ºF.
So every pound of water I see lost on a piece, I figure I'm "adding" ~1130 btus to my wood.
Could the firewood dealer really "season" wood in two weeks? I still doubt it would be acceptable but if my data is any indication, his use of fans and heat would sure get a lot of water out of the wood fast.
The Data
The temperature and relative humidity data are from a local weather station <5 miles from the wood shed.
Piece A -A seasoned piece of fir placed 5' in front of the fan, starting Wt. 3.889 kg (8.5 lbs)
Piece B - A Fresh split piece of fir from a fresh bucked round from Dec. blow down, placed 5' in front of the fan. Starting wt. 4.631 kg
Piece C - A fresh split piece of fir from the same round as piece B, placed away from the fan, ~ 8' over. Starting wt. 3.962 kg
Piece D - A thinner split of fir, from the same round as piece B, placed out of the path of the fan, ~ 8' over. Starting wt. 2.004 kg
Piece E - Wet alder from a fresh split round from a 24" blow down placed in front of the fan. Starting wt. 2.769 kg
Piece F - Wet alder from the same round as Piece E, placed out of the path of the fan, ~8' away. Starting wt. 2.578 kg
Date Ave Wt. (kg) Total Wt.(kg) Total Wt.(kg) Total Wt. (kg) Total Wt.(kg) Total Wt.(kg) Total
RH Dry fir Water Wet Fir Water Wet Fir Water Wet Fir Water Wet Alder Water Wet Alder Water
In Fan Loss In Fan Loss No Fan Loss No Fan Loss In Fan Loss No Fan Loss
Piece A Piece A Piece B Piece B Piece C Piece C Piece D Piece D Piece E Piece E Piece F Piece F
1/7/10 3.889 0.00%
1/13/10 88 3.853 0.93% 4.631 0.00%
1/14/10 86 3.855 0.87% 4.499 2.85% 3.962 0.00%
1/15/10 84 3.845 1.13% 4.378 5.46% 3.894 1.72% 2.004 0.00%
1/16/10 95 3.850 1.00% 4.199 9.33% 3.801 4.06% 1.988 0.80%
1/20/10 78 3.838 1.31% 3.902 15.74% 3.632 8.33% 1.787 10.83% 2.769 0.00% 2.578 0.00%
1/24/10 93 3.830 1.52% 3.545 23.45% 3.437 13.25% 1.620 19.16% 1.767 36.19% 2.015 21.84%
1/28/10 64 3.822 1.72% 3.374 27.14% 3.284 17.11% 1.541 23.10% 1.656 40.20% 1.769 31.38%
2/1/10 94 3.818 1.93% 3.294 28.87% 3.135 20.87% 1.507 24.80% 1.591 42.54% 1.680 34.83%
From previous work measuring water content in mountain snow packs, I knew that a windy day could remove way more water from the snow pack than a warmer but calm day. From that and everything else I've seen, I figured air movement was the most critical aspect in speeding the drying process so I aimed a small fan (34 watts on high) toward my stack with some pieces labeled. Besides I didn't have any way to add heat. I weighed each piece on a kitchen scale before and daily afterwards and put all the data into a spread sheet. Email if you want a copy as it's not an allowed file type.
I put a seasoned piece of fir next to a wet, fresh split piece of fir from a tree that blew over last month. I have two other pieces of fir from that same round (one thin and one big) that are 8' away and not in the path of the fan. I started with just the seasoned piece of fir on Jan 7 and then added the wet pieces of fir on the 13th and later some wet alder on the 20th, one in the fan and one away.
An abbreviated version of the data is below, hopefully you can read it. These are my conclusions so far.
In front of the fan, the wet fir lost over 21% moisture by weight in less than 10 days and the Alder 37% in 5 and over 40% in 10! Talk about accelerating the drying process in the middle of winter

The fan causes the wood to lose moisture almost twice as fast as without the fan in the beginning week or so. More so in the Alder than the fir. I'm guessing this is due to a combination of the higher water content, difference in wood cell properties and since the alder rounds were big enough, the two splits are from inside the bark where as the fir pieces still have their bark on. The fir pieces are also longer.
As expected the wood dries fastest at first and decreases over time allowing the pieces away from the fan to begin to begin to catch up with those in front of the fan, But I am sure the pieces out of the direct path of the fan are still benefitting from the air moving around them as I can feel air movement at their location. I'm sure if I put them under a tarp, drying would slow way down which I think is pretty important for all of us tarp users.
The wood loses more moisture after a dry day verses a rainy humid one. No surprise as relative humidity drives the gradient for moisture loss.
It was nice to see that my "seasoned" fir lost only about 1.8% in over 3 weeks in front of the fan and to see that it gained moisture on the more humid days.
The smaller (thinner) piece of fir definitely dried faster than the fatter split.
I'm sure species like oak would be lots slower but easy to test with this method.
If I have done my math right, (no guarantee, but hopefully in the ball park), it takes ~2500 btus to heat and evaporate 1 kg (2.2 lbs) of water from 60ºF.
So every pound of water I see lost on a piece, I figure I'm "adding" ~1130 btus to my wood.
Could the firewood dealer really "season" wood in two weeks? I still doubt it would be acceptable but if my data is any indication, his use of fans and heat would sure get a lot of water out of the wood fast.
The Data
The temperature and relative humidity data are from a local weather station <5 miles from the wood shed.
Piece A -A seasoned piece of fir placed 5' in front of the fan, starting Wt. 3.889 kg (8.5 lbs)
Piece B - A Fresh split piece of fir from a fresh bucked round from Dec. blow down, placed 5' in front of the fan. Starting wt. 4.631 kg
Piece C - A fresh split piece of fir from the same round as piece B, placed away from the fan, ~ 8' over. Starting wt. 3.962 kg
Piece D - A thinner split of fir, from the same round as piece B, placed out of the path of the fan, ~ 8' over. Starting wt. 2.004 kg
Piece E - Wet alder from a fresh split round from a 24" blow down placed in front of the fan. Starting wt. 2.769 kg
Piece F - Wet alder from the same round as Piece E, placed out of the path of the fan, ~8' away. Starting wt. 2.578 kg
Date Ave Wt. (kg) Total Wt.(kg) Total Wt.(kg) Total Wt. (kg) Total Wt.(kg) Total Wt.(kg) Total
RH Dry fir Water Wet Fir Water Wet Fir Water Wet Fir Water Wet Alder Water Wet Alder Water
In Fan Loss In Fan Loss No Fan Loss No Fan Loss In Fan Loss No Fan Loss
Piece A Piece A Piece B Piece B Piece C Piece C Piece D Piece D Piece E Piece E Piece F Piece F
1/7/10 3.889 0.00%
1/13/10 88 3.853 0.93% 4.631 0.00%
1/14/10 86 3.855 0.87% 4.499 2.85% 3.962 0.00%
1/15/10 84 3.845 1.13% 4.378 5.46% 3.894 1.72% 2.004 0.00%
1/16/10 95 3.850 1.00% 4.199 9.33% 3.801 4.06% 1.988 0.80%
1/20/10 78 3.838 1.31% 3.902 15.74% 3.632 8.33% 1.787 10.83% 2.769 0.00% 2.578 0.00%
1/24/10 93 3.830 1.52% 3.545 23.45% 3.437 13.25% 1.620 19.16% 1.767 36.19% 2.015 21.84%
1/28/10 64 3.822 1.72% 3.374 27.14% 3.284 17.11% 1.541 23.10% 1.656 40.20% 1.769 31.38%
2/1/10 94 3.818 1.93% 3.294 28.87% 3.135 20.87% 1.507 24.80% 1.591 42.54% 1.680 34.83%